[character, ponting at a huge box labeled “IT’S COMMON SENSE”] Interesting, let’s open it to see what’s really inside
[the character opens the box and looks distraught]
[a top down view lets us see what is inside the box] A PRETEXT TO BE RACIST
[character, ponting at a huge box labeled “IT’S COMMON SENSE”] Interesting, let’s open it to see what’s really inside
[the character opens the box and looks distraught]
[a top down view lets us see what is inside the box] A PRETEXT TO BE RACIST
Depends how u interpret what people say. If someone where to say 13% of the population in the us commit 50% of the crime. Some would interpret that as wow maybe we should target our resources at that 13% to prevent said crime. Then u can have a discussion about if said targeting of resources should be called dei policy or fascist targeting of minorities.
The right would argue “more police = less crime” and the left would argue “something something disadvantage let’s not address the crime problem with police cos that’s racist or fascist”. Common sense would tell us that perhaps cops prevent crime and perhaps targeting those resources at the heigh crime areas would reduce crime. So u tell me what’s the common sense solution here?
BTW that stat about 13% is true according to the FBI (yes it was the same under bidden so it’s not trump fucking with the stats)