I couldn’t follow much from news outlets out of Canada.

Rotten Mango takes us through the deep dive. I think anyone with even a passing interest in Hockey, should give this a watch. But, just as the video warns, for those of you who cannot handle topics of sexual assault, please take care and stay safe.

EDIT: Here’s part one.

https://youtu.be/ESBUUa9py80

  • LoveCanada@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    17
    ·
    edit-2
    21 hours ago

    Yeah 2 hours of a full length feature movie with really good actors might hold my attention but two hours of a random youtuber, highly unlikely.

    As for consent, sorry, Im used to being a loving committed relationship, not one night stands with strangers while cheating on my fiance after picking up someone in a bar. I know what my wife likes and doesnt like and once the train leaves the station, we’re not pausing to get ‘informed consent’ about every little change up. But you do you. Or someone else. Whichever :)

    • Icytrees@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      17 hours ago

      Okay… but like you get the whole thing where you can’t really have an informed opinion on something you didn’t watch, right? You don’t have to comment on things you don’t want to watch or read.

      I’m happy for you and your wife! Super weird projecting though, where you equate promiscuity with cheating and short term relationships. I do enjoy short term sexual relationships on occasion, so I like to make sure I’m doing the things my partners want done. After all, you never know someone’s past or preferences.

      No one ever said anything about getting consent to change positions and certainly not in a long term, committed relationship. They said consenting to a blowjob didn’t imply consent to other sexual acts. In fact, it’s in the criminal code. That’s probably why the prosecutor brought it up:

      Sections 276 to 276.5 of the Criminal Code govern the admission of evidence regarding a sexual assault complainant’s other sexual activity. The Code makes it clear that evidence that a complainant has engaged in sexual activity is not admissible to suggest that the victim was more likely to have consented to the sexual activity which is the subject matter of the charge or that he/she is less worthy of belief.

      • LoveCanada@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        9
        ·
        16 hours ago

        I brought up the cheating because it was part of the case. The woman in question was at a hotel bar, got tipsy, picked up the hockey player and despite being engaged, went up to his hotel room for some fun.

    • 1985MustangCobra@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      17 hours ago

      so wait, when you had sex with your wife for the first time, did you just start having sex with her without her saying she wanted it?

      • LoveCanada@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        10
        ·
        17 hours ago

        You want me to discuss the intimate details of my sex life on Lemmy? LOL. Want nudes too?

        • 1985MustangCobra@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          17 hours ago

          don’t pull up and talk about consent when you won’t even tell someone if you even believe in consent in the first place.

          • LoveCanada@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            10
            ·
            17 hours ago

            Of course I dont believe in consent. Its a mans world. We take what we want when we want it. That’s the way its supposed to be. /s

            C’mon man, its not your first day on the internet nor mine. You know and I know exactly where that kind of personal question leads and Im not that dumb.

            • 1985MustangCobra@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              17 hours ago

              listen, believe what you want to believe ya? When someone asks for consent, first learn what consent means and why it’s important.

        • njm1314@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          edit-2
          17 hours ago

          You got a whole paragraph talking about fucking your wife and now you’re shy? Why did you even bring it up in the first place then I don’t get it.

            • njm1314@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              6
              ·
              17 hours ago

              Exactly, so next time maybe don’t bring up how you like to fuck your wife out of the blue.

              • LoveCanada@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                8
                ·
                edit-2
                15 hours ago

                This is Lemmy and the topic was sex and consent and sexual propriety, which as a guy who’s been married twice, once the wrong way and once the right way, I happen to have some opinions on. Not a expert, just know the difference between a good sexual relationship and a bad one so my experience is applicable. Thanks for coming to my TedTalk.