• fonix232@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 hours ago

    With the same attitude one could campaign for ditching digital art tools, hell, even paint and paper, and going back all the way to cave paintings.

    AI is a tool, period. Using it does not denigrate the process, and no, unlike your claim, does not take away from creativity, in fact it can trigger the exact same new ideas other creative processes can.

    What’s truly sad is that you, in complete lack of understanding of how and why AI can be used, are dismissing not just AI but people who use it, putting your ideology of “art purism” as something superior. My recommendation is, you look back in history and see how every single technological advancement that resulted in such outcries and purist movements, has ended up. Small hint: you’re very much on the wrong side of things.

    • agent_nycto@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      43 minutes ago

      Heh, AI is about as much of a tool as a drive through window is to cooking. You aren’t making anything, you’re not part of the process, you’re having a computer copy someone else’s choices and spill it out for you. This isn’t like a camera where people make choices with lenses, lighting and framing, this is you giving up your creative agency because you want a picture and don’t care how you got it.

      Ai images aren’t art, and it’s sad that you think they are.

      • fonix232@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 minutes ago

        Ah, so you’ve been debating in bad faith all along.

        off you fuck then, troll.