• Blum0108@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    14 hours ago

    ~20% weight reduction for a total vehicle weight isn’t small change. Plus batteries will continue to improve as well. Do you just get off on being negative?

      • Dave.@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        10 hours ago

        The gains compound a bit too, 20 percent less weight equals proportionally less battery capacity required to shift the now-lighter vehicle from point A to point B.

        So then you can cut the size of the battery while maintaining the same range, and that’s where you start to get significant overall weight and cost savings.

        • Alcoholicorn@mander.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          9 hours ago

          Hell just replace the former motor weight with battery and you’ve almost doubled the range. If China ever mass produces solid state batteries, double it again.