cross-posted from: https://lemmy.zip/post/52369691

According to the complaint, Toyota and its hydrogen partner, FirstElement Fuel (True Zero), intentionally concealed evidence of:

  • hydrogen leaks near hot engine components, creating explosion risks

  • sudden power loss, acceleration, and braking failures leading to collisions and injuries

  • a collapsing hydrogen infrastructure, leaving drivers stranded for weeks without access to fuel

  • aggressive financial collection tactics by Toyota Motor Credit Corporation, targeting owners of inoperable vehicles.

  • Brave Little Hitachi Wand@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    3 days ago

    I’ve always gotten nothing but weird vibes from proponents of hydrogen. Everyone I’ve ever spoken with is either sceptical and waiting for it to make sense, an unshakeable zealot, or a speculative investor who hates BEVs.

    • NauticalNoodle@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      I’m a proponent of Hydrogen if for no other reason than I find it foolish for the transportation industry to place all of it’s eggs in one basket.

    • rbesfe@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 days ago

      99% of the world’s hydrogen comes from natural gas steam reforming. That’s why the vibes are so weird, it’s a fossil fuel industry distraction

    • Diplomjodler@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      It has a place in heavy industry. But right now green hydrogen is very scarce and expensive. Until that changes, it will be somewhat boutique.

    • SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 days ago

      It takes huge energy to produce, store and transport. Just use that energy directly. Calling hydrogen stupid was the only smart thing Elon Musk has ever said.

    • hanrahan@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      3 days ago

      It can never work, the energy needed to make it is more then energy available from the H. It’s like needing 1 barrel of oil to make 3/4 of a barrel of oil.

      • Mihies@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        3 days ago

        I’d say this is the least problematic aspect of all. If it was a viable energy storage solution, then it’d work even with higher energy input.

      • Brave Little Hitachi Wand@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        3 days ago

        If that energy came from renewables then it could have some uses (wherever nothing but hydrogen will do), but yeah.

        The case with transit is such that they keep trying to invent ways not to use trains, and we just have to tap our feet and wait for them to look facts in the face.

      • SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        I guess you never been to the Alberta tar sands, that’s exactly what they do with gas and water to make oil.

    • Frezik@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      I’m glad the ICE hydrogen engines have been coming out. Not because they’re directly useful. Outside of an engineering challenge (which is perfectly fine), they have no purpose outside of some racing applications.

      I like them because it flags people who obviously have no idea what they’re talking about. They like ICEs for what it is. And I do actually get that; from an engineering perspective, there’s a lot of fascinating things going on inside there. However, efficiency was already hydrogen’s biggest weakness. Fuel cells are 40-60% efficient, and is only one part of the hydrogen chain. You’re going to replace that part of a chain with something that has traditionally struggled to get 25% efficiency? Why? You’re doubling down on hydrogen’s biggest weakness. This is the opposite of min-maxing.

      So anyway, if they bring that up as anything other than engineering and racing purposes, they’re a moron.

      • Brave Little Hitachi Wand@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        Yeah I’ve seen those, and agree. It’s cool that you can do that stuff, but it’s not gonna happen. Just use BEV already and build more trains.