solarpunk.rizz.pill@slrpnk.net to Memes@lemmy.mlEnglish · 16 hours agoBro might be needing a neuralink frfrslrpnk.netimagemessage-square17fedilinkarrow-up179arrow-down11 cross-posted to: memes@slrpnk.net
arrow-up178arrow-down1imageBro might be needing a neuralink frfrslrpnk.netsolarpunk.rizz.pill@slrpnk.net to Memes@lemmy.mlEnglish · 16 hours agomessage-square17fedilink cross-posted to: memes@slrpnk.net
minus-squarepurplemonkeymad@programming.devlinkfedilinkarrow-up14·7 hours agoThat’s watts multiplied by time, aka energy.
minus-squareTomtits@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2arrow-down5·7 hours agoSo if you can have a kilowatt per hour, then why can’t you have a gigawatt per year?
minus-squareTaTTe@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up12·6 hours agoBecause it’s not kilowatt per hour (kW/h), it’s kilowatt hours (kWh). It would be fine to say GW years, but then the question would be over how long? Most likely one year, which gives us GWy/y = GW.
minus-squareSaymaz@lemmygrad.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up4·5 hours agoKilowatt per hour is not energy. It’s just power generated per hour. Energy would be kilowatt × hour.
That’s watts multiplied by time, aka energy.
So if you can have a kilowatt per hour, then why can’t you have a gigawatt per year?
Because it’s not kilowatt per hour (kW/h), it’s kilowatt hours (kWh). It would be fine to say GW years, but then the question would be over how long? Most likely one year, which gives us GWy/y = GW.
Kilowatt per hour is not energy. It’s just power generated per hour. Energy would be kilowatt × hour.
deleted by creator