• GhostPain@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      23 hours ago

      Water? Brother that’s 50’s tech.

      We’re on to Cold Fusion reactors the size of your fist, SRO high-entropy alloys, and room temp superconductors.

      :D

      • turdcollector69@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        11 hours ago

        Really though.

        I’ve been saying it for a while, even if we figured out fusion, it wouldn’t see the light of day.

        The petrodollar would tank in value because fusion is obviously superior to gasoline/petrol.

        It would be the end of the US currency if petroleum were to be replaced.

        • Tar_Alcaran@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          9 hours ago

          I’ve been saying it for a while, even if we figured out fusion, it wouldn’t see the light of day.

          Fusion reactors would be absolutely massive, hugely expensive, centralized facilities that provide something of great value for very little labour input. They’re the PERFECT tool of capitalism.

        • LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          10 hours ago

          See I can’t see this being true, because if we figured out how to do it, and let someone else do it first, they would get all of the gains first.

          • turdcollector69@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            9 hours ago

            That’s a valid counterpoint that I’m definitely too intoxicated to properly address but idk I think you cooked me on that one.