• Eager Eagle@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      92
      ·
      edit-2
      5 days ago

      No, this is about adding guidelines for tool-generated submissions to the kernel. The tailwind conversation was on making their documentations more accessible to AI tools.

      Linus doesn’t want to add guidelines to not fuel any side of the whole discussion, and says that adding guidelines won’t solve the problem because a lot of times it’s not trivial to detect whether or not a contribution was written with AI tools, after all, “documentation is for good actors”, hinting that anyone contributing AI slop is not expected to respect it anyway.

      • INeedMana@piefed.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        5 days ago

        Thank you for that context. I fear the day we discover something bad about Linus. In my eyes he’s been very based since forever

          • 1984@lemmy.today
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            10
            ·
            4 days ago

            He is almost always right. He just expresses it in a way that hurts people a lot, and thats something he needs to work on. The term toxic is over used but yeah, he was very rude, insensitive, and offensive sometimes.

          • INeedMana@piefed.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            4 days ago

            That’s pretty mild compared to what I’m afraid of. Of course that it’s not good that he is that way, although I would argue that any kind of bugzilla of an open source project is a toxic environment in itself, but that’s not “rape-slaves in the basement” level kind of stuff