The billionaire wants to advance his political program while preserving his power and wealth

  • TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 months ago

    If you didn’t think this was the point of him buying twitter…

    It was never about the money, its about growing and empowering a movement that the global oligarchy think they can control.

        • CableMonster@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          9 months ago

          Yeah, if I ever disagree I get called a MAGA, so literally the left has become what they used to hate.

          • Olhonestjim@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            9 months ago

            Dude, you support Trump. You’re a maga.

            People criticizing you does not violate your free speech. Getting banned from a website does not violate your free speech. Nobody is arresting you.

            What right wingers mean by free speech is they want the law to protect people using racial slurs and discrimination above the rights of the people they hate to live equitably within society.

            They want to go back to the 1950s, exactly the way they keep saying.

      • Olhonestjim@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        We already had it. Musk took it away.

        What right were you looking for? The right to call certain people certain words?

        • eardon@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          9 months ago

          Let me guess, users should be banned because they don’t agree trans women are the same as regular women?

          • Olhonestjim@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            9 months ago

            Maybe. I don’t care if they get banned. But other people definitely should not be banned for telling them to fuck off.

    • Ashyr@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 months ago

      It was never a clever ploy. He’s an idiot that said something he shouldn’t have it may ruin far more than Twitter before all is said and done.

      • TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        9 months ago

        I didn’t say it was clever, just that it was obvious. This was an opportunity for a foreign government (Saudis) to buy media/ narrative control over US media. A rightwing/ fascist government is easier for them to work on, so they do things that support its creation.

    • CitizenKong@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 months ago

      Which is exactly the same plan as last time. Then, the ultra-rich were afraid of communism so they propped up nationalism. Now though, they are after democracy as such.

      • whereisk@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        9 months ago

        What’s the downside for them? They either win big or things stay roughly the same and they might pay some extra tax but not much. No one (of them) is losing their bulk of their wealth or their freedom. Might as well roll the dice.

        • MrMakabar@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          9 months ago

          Ask the Russian oligarchs how they feel about Purin causing massive sanctions against Russia.

          • AnUnusualRelic@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            9 months ago

            Or about throwing half of them in jail (or through the window) because they said something he didn’t like or because he wanted their stuff.

            Everyone thinks the leopard only eats other people’s faces.