stabby_cicada@slrpnk.net to Solarpunk@slrpnk.net · 2 years agoconsider the implications for a post scarcity futureslrpnk.netimagemessage-square392fedilinkarrow-up11.74Karrow-down172cross-posted to: aboringdystopia@lemmy.world
arrow-up11.67Karrow-down1imageconsider the implications for a post scarcity futureslrpnk.netstabby_cicada@slrpnk.net to Solarpunk@slrpnk.net · 2 years agomessage-square392fedilinkcross-posted to: aboringdystopia@lemmy.world
minus-squareMagnetar@feddit.delinkfedilinkarrow-up3·2 years agoThose still have to be connected to the grid. be maintained, cooled, controlled, all of which costs money.
minus-squarelightnsfw@reddthat.comlinkfedilinkarrow-up3·2 years agoOkay? So does the entire rest of the grid.
minus-squareblindsight@beehaw.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up3·2 years agoThe point is that those have a cost, so grid has to pay for them, essentially. Hence negative electricity prices.
Those still have to be connected to the grid. be maintained, cooled, controlled, all of which costs money.
Okay? So does the entire rest of the grid.
The point is that those have a cost, so grid has to pay for them, essentially. Hence negative electricity prices.