• Björn Tantau@swg-empire.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    6 months ago

    Can’t remember when exactly. But basically as soon as they wanted to roam around in a bigger radius. Maybe 6, 7 or 8. It gave them the security to explore. They know that it’s GPS tracked. And if they don’t feel well they can always call us, even if it’s just so that they don’t feel alone.

    Sure, we didn’t have that as kids. But we also had phone booths on every corner and some change in our pockets.

  • BenVimes@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 months ago

    My wife and I had this conversation the other day. Our kid is only two right now, but as we’ve learned, these milestones sneak up on you.

    I used my own life as a guide to my opinion, and so landed on age eight or so. That’s around the age I remember being able to go to the park or to a friend’s house within the neighbourhood on my own.

    Other questions about how much functionality the phone would have and how much access they would have to it at home are still to be determined.

  • invertedspear@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    It’s shown in school that kids who get phones and tablets before 5 have a hard time using computers with a keyboard and mouse interface.

    Having a dumb phone is a current consideration. We have a smart phone on a separate carrier that we loan to a kid on an as needed basis like sleep overs so they can contact us in an emergency.

    I’ve told the kids I’ll buy them a smart phone when they can afford the monthly service. It’s not that I can’t, it’s that they will need to learn how to manage money, and having to pay for my pager in the 90s was a good start for me. Not getting it sooner means it won’t feel like a punishment when they start.

      • invertedspear@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        Probably but that’s a pretty poor comparison unless you think there’s a near future where the keyboard and mouse interface is relegated to hobbyists. Being able to touch type and work on a multitasking computer are not requirements for all jobs, but will be required skills for a long time for a lot of jobs.

  • FartsWithAnAccent@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 months ago

    15, before that it was a dumbphone for emergencies. Had a tablet too, but use was restricted and the device was locked down.

  • Jay@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 months ago

    My kids are grown now so my comment probably isn’t all that relevant anymore, but I don’t think there should be a set age to give your kid a smart phone. Different kids mature and learn at different ages, even ones from the same household.

    For my kids, I got them their first phones in their early teens but those phones were somewhat restricted so that we could still communicate easily but we knew they couldn’t get into too much trouble with them. As time progressed the restrictions slowly lifted as we knew we could trust them more to not get into trouble with them.

    I’ve always believed it’s not a parents duty to protect their child from the world as much as it is to prepare them for it. Of course kids are going to make stupid decisions if you let them go too far (we all have) so I think it’s more about slowly easing them into things and helping them make the right decisions the best we can.

    • hungryphrog@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      Exactly. You can’t just say that X age is too young to get a phone, because age doesn’t determine the kid’s level of resposibility or their ability to practice healthy phone usage and internet safety. And also some kids simply need a phone more than others.

      • wellDuuh@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 months ago

        Tbh kids have zero idea of what’s out there… controlling their exposure IS important. shitty, but important!

  • Zerlyna@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    Mine is almost 12 and I’m not sure she is ready for that. She has an iPad now and her friends all chat via Discord. I have an old phone for 911 calls only.

  • Emmie@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    As a non parent of Lemmy I would give my fake daughter a clay tablet at the age of 13

    You know if my fake kids were ever to remark that I was abusive I would like it to be because of not buying them phone. Id love to be a fly on the wall of that therapy session

  • LifeOfChance@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 months ago

    We started at 3y/o. With that said we did so in a controlled way. So the original plan was a tablet but for a fraction of the price we got a very basic smartphone with no service meaning just at home with internet. We started with a max of 20m once a week to make it kind of special but nothing something to become crazy about. Over the years we have given more time for things like chores with a max of 2h a week typically stretched out over the week and some times we would just have a lazy day with it so all 2h in one go. We knew it was tech that she was going to need skills with so we don’t count things like learning math or enligh against the hours allowed. We began practicing how to text and make calls with our phones and routinely make blocked calls when she’s using one of our phones to see what she does and to encourage open communication with us. For us this method has worked amazingly but I know this is not the norm for most.

  • Fake4000@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 months ago

    I would keep a small dumb phone as a family phone for when kids go on trips and sleep overs. They get a personal smartphone at around the age of 16 or 18.

  • foggy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 months ago

    Honestly, if I can afford it I’m getting it to them whenever other parents are getting it to their kids.

    There were plenty of parents who held off on getting things like TV, the Internet, and it had no pronounced effect.

    My buddy just had a kid and proudly said “they’re never getting a smartphone.” And I was like “dude you slept over my house to watch porn because you didn’t have Internet in the 90s. You do you, but like… Idk. That won’t go the way you think it will.”

    • Apollo2323@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      Are you sure it didn’t have any effect? I have seen some kids who wouldn’t put their phone away when they are walking, when they are talking to others , etc. Their attention span is so low they cant even concentrate.

      Also the dangers of the internet and what stuff you can find. I will give them a phone when they are old enough to understand that. Maybe 15 -16

      • foggy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 months ago

        Yes, I’m sure. This is a tale as old as time.

        Same was said of newspapers. Same was said of television. Same was said of videogames. Same was said of the internet.

        Humans get new tool. Old people who grew up without tool look down on young for overusing tool.

        • ChexMax@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          5 months ago

          I mean sometimes it has /some/ effect. I’m in my late 20s, so was a kid somewhat recently. We grew up without television. We had movies, and we had the Internet, but no TV. My dad didn’t want us mindlessly wasting time on stuff we weren’t even interested in just because it was what was “on right now.” Not to mention the accumulative hours of watching ads.

          We all ended up more creative and artistic than our peers, and my relationships with my siblings are stronger than those of my friends. We read a lot (though people I knew with TV also often read a lot so I don’t think that’s necessarily a given, though I know I myself would not have been regularly reading a book a day in middle school if TV had been an option)

          I’m just saying limiting time wasted on media is often net positive.

  • nmill11b@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 months ago

    My kids are 5, and Im not sure it’s on the horizon in the next few years. There are no answers here, but I have the same question and have been wondering about how others approach this.

    I didn’t haven’t my first phone until 25, and it’s a different, much more connected world now, however.

    • lemmyreader@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      A family I know give their kids limited screen time per day on the home laptops. No phones yet.

      • wellDuuh@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        6 months ago

        My dad used to throw documents at me to type. They where soo random, I could have sworn I was in his pissing list or something.

        Now? I’m thankful! dude i can type fast

  • BlueÆther@no.lastname.nz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    Our first daughter had a old smart phone at about 8 (she has just turned 9). It doesn’t have data turned on, so is more or less a dumb phone unless she is at home. I don’t think her little sister could care less about getting one.

    I think that it’s good for her to have one as it means she can contact us if she goes up the road to her friends or park/shop.

    She doesn’t have it for at school or general day to day life - so it may not be the best example

  • The Bard in Green@lemmy.starlightkel.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    We gave my son a smart phone at 8, because his mother and I lived in different states and he flew as an unaccompanied minor a LOT. I also lived in Oakland and I wanted to be able to reach him and to know where he was when he was with me.

    We had strict rules about when he was allowed to have it on and when he was not allowed to NOT have it. We also didn’t get him a data plan and made him use Wifi.

    As a result of him actually being impressively responsible with that phone, we turned on the data and relaxed the rules probably years earlier than we would have under other circumstances.

  • angelsomething@lemmy.one
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 months ago

    We gave our kid their first proper smartphone when they had to do a bit of travel to get to school. However, I’ve fully embraced the parental controls of Google family link and Microsoft safety and it’s been great so far. The combination of both provides incredibly granular controls to what they can see on the web, how long they use specific apps and what apps they’re allowed to install.

    • Tolookah@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      I’ve got complaints about Google family link’s limits. They don’t work right.

      This is on the family tablet.

      As for phones, my kid will get a phone sometime after they ask for one, likely when I upgrade mine. (Unless it’s a forced upgrade due to gravity or water)

      • folkrav@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 months ago

        What’s wrong with the screenshot? I have no idea what the numbers mean but I’d guess 28min is how long the app was opened, and 20m is how much video was watched?

  • Crackhappy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 months ago

    Four kids, smartphone distribution from top to bottom was about 15, 14, 14, 12. It was all of course dependent on the age of the kid and the ability to cope with the immense wealth of bullshit you get from having a smartphone.