• USSBurritoTruck@startrek.websiteM
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 months ago

    Yeah, I can’t wrap my head around it either. Easily the worst, most self indulgent season of Trek in my opinion.

    But it had the TNG crew back aboard the Enterprise D so for a lot of people it’s hitting the nostalgia button.

    • 1simpletailer@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 months ago

      It was… Okay. Better then the first 2 seasons of Pic by a mile at least. If it was just the first 5 or so episodes I might even call it good. Yeah it was big, dumb, and loud, but it was also full of nostalgia bait, some of which admittedly did resonate with me. The bar was just so low after the TNG movies and first two season of PIC that traumatized fans were happy to have a seemingly final sendoff that wasn’t completely terrible.

      • USSBurritoTruck@startrek.websiteM
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        9 months ago

        The bar was just so low after the TNG movies and first two season of PIC that traumatized fans were happy to have a seemingly final sendoff that wasn’t completely terrible.

        “Traumatized?” We are talking about a television show, right?

        • SteleTrovilo@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          9 months ago

          The deaths of

          spoiler

          Hugh and Icheb

          were particularly upsetting for me, personally (especially the graphic nature of the latter). PIC S1 had way too much “let’s kill people for no good reason” events.

          I’d be perfectly happy if the dead PIC characters just showed up alive and well in a later show, no reason given. (They already did this with Q, right?)

          • USSBurritoTruck@startrek.websiteM
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            9 months ago

            Fair, PIC did have some pretty rugged moments.

            But would you say you actually experienced trauma watching season one, and then that trauma was alleviated watching season three?

    • BowtiesAreCool@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 months ago

      It wasn’t great, but it was notably better than season 2 in that it actually felt like a season of a show with some thought put into some kind of continuity. Season 2 was a huge clusterfuck of awful

      • USSBurritoTruck@startrek.websiteM
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        9 months ago

        I would argue that even if season two’s ambitions exceeded it’s execution, at least it was trying to do something. Still not a season of Trek that I think deserves any real regard, but it did add something new and interesting to the fabric of Trek. And maybe at some point some comic book or novel will actually do something interesting with that thing, because I can’t imagine we’re ever actually going to see it revisited on screen.

        Season three was exactly the dark, cynical mess that everyone complained season one was because Admiral Clancy cursed at their space dad. Jack Crusher is the infallible, ultra special badass everyone accuses Michael Burnham of being. Season three is ideas I would expect to find in someone’s first attempt at writing fanfic, not the work of seasoned television professionals.

        And, to be fair, both seasons two and three were made by the same people, so the fact that neither of them were particularly good should not be shocking to anyone.