• lemmyvore@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 months ago

    I expect the KeepassXC people are mostly bothered by the naming of the package because the version called “keepassxc” is now the basic one. Anyway, the maintainer has offered to call them -minimal and -full and to make “keepassxc” a metapackage that pops up a debconf dialog telling users that install it to choose one. There is precedent with other complex packages that are split into basic and full. This should solve things nicely for everyone.

    • PlexSheep@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      That sounds reasonable. I use the package on LMDE6, the one currently in stable though. Having a minimal keepassxc and a full one makes sense to me.