So my company decided to migrate office suite and email etc to Microsoft365. Whatever. But for 2FA login they decided to disable the option to choose “any authenticator” and force Microsoft Authenticator on the (private) phones of both employees and volunteers. Is there any valid reason why they would do this, like it’s demonstrably safer? Or is this a battle I can pick to shield myself a little from MS?

  • Nighed@sffa.community
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    It’s not that different is it? You still need to get a user to share/enter a live code?

    • AtariDump@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      One requires the user to go to a bad page and get a spoofed 2FA code so the bad guy can log in.

      Do you know how hard that is? Not worth it for 99% of hacks.

      The other requires that the user read off their six digit code on their device.

      Trivial easy since they already have the user’s password.

      • Nighed@sffa.community
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        It requires the bad guy to go to the page and ask the user to enter the code the bad guy gets

        • AtariDump@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          5 months ago

          How does the bad guy get to the page?

          Then how does he get the user to enter in that code into their mobile device?