TheDuffmaster@lemmy.world to Programmer Humor@lemmy.ml · 1 year agoSwitching to OCaml boislemmy.worldimagemessage-square83fedilinkarrow-up123arrow-down10
arrow-up123arrow-down1imageSwitching to OCaml boislemmy.worldTheDuffmaster@lemmy.world to Programmer Humor@lemmy.ml · 1 year agomessage-square83fedilink
minus-squareMiaou@jlai.lulinkfedilinkarrow-up1·1 year agoWith such a broad definition you could call even Haskell an oop language
minus-squareEthan@programming.devlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0arrow-down1·1 year agoSo you’re arguing that “Object oriented” shouldn’t apply to languages that are oriented around objects?
With such a broad definition you could call even Haskell an oop language
So you’re arguing that “Object oriented” shouldn’t apply to languages that are oriented around objects?