• hellofriend@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    35
    ·
    7 months ago

    Nah, that’s not the issue (nor do I believe in magic bullets, but that’s a different matter). See, the issue is that MDMA can’t be patented. Anyone can make it so no one pharmacorp can have a 20 year monopoly

      • hellofriend@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        7 months ago

        You sound like you’d be interested in David Healy’s work. Check out Children of the Cure if you haven’t already. That, as well as a plethora of other shady things I learned in university, are responsible for reorienting me toward public policy rather than becoming a practicing psychologist.

    • Bakkoda@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      7 months ago

      Usually first to market work generics enjoys a year of exclusivity. Usually other companies abandon our back burnera project they don’t make to market first. There’s still money to be made. Just not as much.

      • AggressivelyPassive@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        7 months ago

        I think you don’t quite understand the comment.

        Current pharmaceuticals are usually a (life)long prescription. It’s not like antibiotics, where you get a dose for a few days or weeks and you’re done. Antidepressants have to be taken for years. Every day. That means revenue every day. It’s a treatment, not a cure.

        MDMA on the other hand is a (potential) cure. You take it a few times under supervision and that’s it.

        Problem is, this takes away customers from the former group. And that means, far less revenue from “traditional” psychopharmacology products. MDMA cannibalizes other drugs.