0nekoneko7@lemmy.world to Linux@lemmy.mlEnglish · 1 year agoKaspersky releases free tool that scans Linux for known threatswww.bleepingcomputer.comexternal-linkmessage-square83fedilinkarrow-up132arrow-down115
arrow-up117arrow-down1external-linkKaspersky releases free tool that scans Linux for known threatswww.bleepingcomputer.com0nekoneko7@lemmy.world to Linux@lemmy.mlEnglish · 1 year agomessage-square83fedilink
minus-squareboredsquirrel@slrpnk.netlinkfedilinkarrow-up2arrow-down1·1 year agoI HIGHLY doubt that they would detect the XZ backdoor
minus-squarefar_university1990@feddit.delinkfedilinkarrow-up2·1 year agoBöhmermann in freier Wildbahn gesichtet
minus-squarePossibly linux@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·edit-21 year agoEven if it did, what would you do? rm -rf /? XZ is part of the core system
minus-squareatzanteol@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·1 year agoWhy? It’s not hard. They typically hash files and look for hits against a database of known vulnerabilities.
minus-squarePossibly linux@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·edit-21 year agoThat doesn’t work against polymorphic malware I think the best way is to monitor calls and behavior. Doing that is a privacy nightmare
minus-squareatzanteol@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·1 year agoWho’s talking about polymorphic malware? We were talking about the xz backdoor.
minus-squarePossibly linux@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·1 year agoOh well in that case there is no chance
minus-squareboredsquirrel@slrpnk.netlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·1 year agoYes and if viruses use something like base64 encoding or other methods, the hashes dont match anymore. As far as I understood it, it is pretty easy to make your virus permanently un-hashable by just always changing some bits
minus-squareatzanteol@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·1 year agoThe xz backdoor was a packaged file distributed with the standard packages though. It would be trivial to find.
minus-squareboredsquirrel@slrpnk.netlinkfedilinkarrow-up0·1 year agoThis is obviously not about this known file. It is about “would this scanner detect a system package from the official repos opening an ssh connection”
minus-squareatzanteol@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·1 year agoSorry, I was responding to: I HIGHLY doubt that they would detect the XZ backdoor
I HIGHLY doubt that they would detect the XZ backdoor
Böhmermann in freier Wildbahn gesichtet
War auch überrascht
Even if it did, what would you do? rm -rf /?
XZ is part of the core system
Why? It’s not hard. They typically hash files and look for hits against a database of known vulnerabilities.
That doesn’t work against polymorphic malware
I think the best way is to monitor calls and behavior. Doing that is a privacy nightmare
Who’s talking about polymorphic malware? We were talking about the xz backdoor.
Oh well in that case there is no chance
Yes and if viruses use something like base64 encoding or other methods, the hashes dont match anymore.
As far as I understood it, it is pretty easy to make your virus permanently un-hashable by just always changing some bits
The xz backdoor was a packaged file distributed with the standard packages though. It would be trivial to find.
This is obviously not about this known file.
It is about “would this scanner detect a system package from the official repos opening an ssh connection”
Sorry, I was responding to: