• jet@hackertalks.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 months ago

    It does. It has hole punching incorporated into the protocol. So as long as it can get to the internet, it can use coordination servers and do double hole punching so that they can talk to each other

    • Kid@sh.itjust.worksOPM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      Interesting. I didn’t know that syncthing does hole punching.

      From a defense perspective, how would this work with an enterprise firewall, with UDP/TCP only allowed to specific destinations or specific sources. Example: only the internal DNS relay server can access 53/UDP and only the internal proxy server can access 80/443. What I mean is in a network with a very closed firewall, how would Syncthing be able to connect with peers?

      • jet@hackertalks.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        If the firewall was properly locking down servers to functions then it shouldn’t work. But if it has general Web access sync thing is very resilient

        This is the reason people use sync thing and recommend it, it’s really hard to kill

        • seang96@spgrn.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          7 months ago

          Bestbet would probably be baock on an application level. I swapped to bitwarden since syncthing wasn’t liked by the AV on my work pc and I was using it to sync my password db.