• BarrelAgedBoredom@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    All of human political activity boils down to violence. If pacifism were a legitimate strategy then we wouldn’t be in our current situation.

    • Bigfoot@lemm.eeOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      I didn’t say anything about pacifism, but I also disagree with your proposition equating violence and politics. Violence is a breakdown of politics. Politics, almost definitionally, is how a people settle disputes without violence.

        • Bigfoot@lemm.eeOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          5 months ago

          It is, but diplomacy refers to disputes between peoples. Politics refers to disputes within a people.

      • BarrelAgedBoredom@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        Pacifism is an ideology centered on political change through nonviolence. Maybe you didn’t explicitly say it, but you might as well have. Can you provide a source on violence being a result of political breakdown and not intrinsic to politics itself? How do current regimes uphold their power?

        Politics is, more or less, how decisions are made in groups. Making a decision doesn’t preclude violence. Wars are political and their entire point is violence. Colonialism was foundational to the politics of the last 3+ centuries and it was incredibly violent. Besides vibes, what evidence do you have to support the claim that politics aren’t violent?