Lots of these creeps could do that. The thing is they won’t to “protect their legacy” when, ironically, speaking out, admitting their own crimes, apologizing to their victims & taking full legal and personal accountability, and taking the other bastards down would be the best thing they could do to leave something of a positive legacy and begin to atone.
Idk. I think people get legitimate prescriptions and sell pills, mostly. If it’s not buying from someone you know who sourced them that way, idk how you’d verify it’s what they say it is.
I’m not saying that it’s true, it’d just be extremely funny.
Yeah, I know some Gen Z college kids, and I will attest they definitely spend significant money on alcohol. And cigarettes.
I wouldn’t be surprised if the vice money is just split between alcohol, cigarettes, weed, vape carts, and adderall. So, just diluted.
What if Chomsky was the only one ACTUALLY associated with Epstein for tax advice. He was too autistic to get the whole wink wink nudge nudge routine and was just like “Jeff I have a real nightmare of a tax situation I need help with, but I don’t see why I’d need to take a trip to the Bahamas: can I just email my documents to you?”
What it was: PDF of an email exchange between a Special Agent from the Child Exploitation and Human Trafficking Task Force and someone from the FBI NY Violent Crimes Division with numerous reports of women accusing Donald Trump, Ivanka and Eric Trump, Epstein, Musk, Dershowitz, Bill & Hillary Clinton, Members of the British Royal Family, Jamie Foxx and others of sexual assault/being present at events where they were assaulted when they (the victims) were minors.
Weird plot for the Braveheart reboot
Yeah emoluments clause went out the window in trumps first term. Like week one, probably.
uNdEr FiRe
Oh yeah for sure. Just make sure it isn’t sorbitol or you’d spend the same time on the toilet that cigarettes would shorten your life by
Art of the deal, folks
Idk, seems like a variable reinforcement schedule to me. They are typically more effective at building lasting behaviors.
I think this would just get you addicted to gum while tapering you off nicotine (assuming you decrease the number ofnicotine gum pieces).
Go to the doctor. Especially if you are in otherwise OK shape and your capacity for exercise doesn’t seem to improve with practice. Being unable to walk for one hour without severe fatigue is pretty good evidence of exercise intolerance.
Exercise intolerance is basically an inability to perform physical activities that someone your age typically would be able to.
This can be evidence of various underlying health issues (heart, lungs, muscle disorders, nutritional deficiencies).
I’ll believe it when I see it
是很漂亮！It looks like a font. Extremely neat. Though, the “tails” on some of your letters are so short that they might be mistaken for other letters.
Like your P could be mistaken for a D
Fair enough. You aren’t wrong. I think we’re just concerned with different points here, which is fine.
Note: I’m not arguing that it’s legal for cops to use them against civilians, just that it’s fucked up that it’s legal for use against civilians but not soldiers.
If that were true, there would be a carve out in the provision for the use of gasses with transient effects, like cs gas. There is none. Just the opposite, there is a carve out for their use against civilians, but they are prohibited in warfare.
Many other countries do not use CS gas in warfare due to the CWC (Australia, Canada, Greece, India, Netherlands, New Zealand, Spain, etc. - there are a lot). https://ihl-databases.icrc.org/en/customary-ihl/v2/rule75 => pulls provisions from the laws of various countries as well as combat manuals detailing the usages of riot control gasses and their various rationales.
The US chooses not to interpret the CWC as banning riot control gasses for war, that is a minority position and the US gets away with it like it does many breaches of international law. The US uses riot control gas weapons against civilians… liberally and in a way that most of the world would see as police brutality. It’s use is on the rise globally, but it has been used extremely widely by US cops for a long time and in problematic ways.
If it is used to disperse dangerous protests as a deterrant to advance, sure, I get it. But that is not how it is typically used by US cops. In the US cops have killed a number of people by firing tear gas cannisters at them from close range. They deploy tear gas in the middle of crowds causing panic and the risk of stampede deaths/crowd surges. They deploy tear gas behind crowds causing them to move toward police. They deploy tear gas in situations that do not warrant it, on peaceful protests that may involve at-risk people. They use tear gas in enclosed spaces or against kettled crowds, increasing the risk of death due to respiratory distress.
Human rights groups have noticed this pattern of behavior by cops in the US and increasingly globally. You can find dozens of articles and studies by the CFC, ACLU, Red Cross, Amnesty International, Physicians for Human Rights, etc. It is a majority position among human rights groups that these agents should be banned or heavily restricted.
In response to a comment saying that it’s torture, me stating that it’s banned for use in war by the geneva convention?
Well, connecting the dots there, that if it’s too inhumane/painful/uncontrollable for warfare, it probably shouldn’t be allowed to be used on masses of civilians expressing their rights.
UNLOADS! REALLY DUMB!
+1 for smart launcher. I got it back when the paid version was like 5 bucks. It’s more now, but I’ve been very happy with it overall.
Lawnchair also looks great. I’d consider switching if Smart Launcher becomes enshittified or if Lawnchair has better features.