Main account: @Blaze@reddthat.com
That’s a nice roadmap
There is probably no reason now, but hopefully in the near future Sublinks will reach feature parity with Lemmy, and could even surpass it. Technological stack can have a huge impact on the development speed of a project.
In other words, let’s wait and see
Java, Go, TypeScript, and HTML
Different technologies. Rust is a more niche language, which is sometimes used to explain why there aren’t that many contributors to Lemmy
Welcome!
Makes sense, let us know about the progress on your project, seems promising!
That’s interesting.
The demo indeed looks very much like Lemmy, I guess the changes are mostly in the back-end side: https://demo.sublinks.org/
There is !harrypotter@literature.cafe if you want to join. There is some activity at the moment, but not enough to go for a dedicated instance.
Also, as the other comments have shown, the bigotry of the author does not help.
If you ever try to get someone you know off that platform
It’s happening
Here is a lift of all the Lemmy clients: https://lemmyapps.netlify.app/
For Android, the usual recommended are Voyager, Thunder, Connect, Eternity, Raccoon (sorry if I forgot any)
You can also have a look at https://lemmyapps.netlify.app/
There should be one that you’ll like
From what I remember, the mbin team was indeed discussing it. I don’t remember the details, but I think it was aligned with what you are saying.
I think so, that’s not that big of a deal, is it?
https://github.com/MbinOrg/mbin has more active development
I was unpopular 3 months ago
If they go close source, other people will take the last version of the code and build on it
What did you say? Lemmy.ml is known to be quite biased towards China’s regime
The issue is that due to the different defederation policies, if you want to communicate to the whole fediverse audience, you need to both.
Hexbear, the 8th largest Lemmy instance, cannot access !fediverse@lemmy.world. They have to access !fediverse@lemmy.ml.
On the other side, some users don’t want to subscribe to the .ml version due to the political background of the instance.
So in the end anyone posting have to do it twice, otherwise the audience they want to reach won’t see their content.
Posting the same content in both will cause me to see duplicates.
That’s exactly one of the issues I was pointing out in the post. There should be a unique !fediverse community. But as soon as you suggest this idea, people come saying that the only one should be their one (see above). Which brings you to the audience fragmentation.
Isn’t Artemis in beta?
!casualconversation@lemmy.world !movies@lemm.ee !lego@lemmy.world