It’s only decipherable to people who have kept up with the last two years of IMG Gen jargon.
The animation stuff you mentioned exists today:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gt1yNJ180Cs
i cri evrytiem
I found this guide on how to make an inpainting model out of any model. Though it’s pretty out of date.
Is this an attempt to beat those monopoly allegations?
Yeah, this seems like the last confirmation we didn’t really need.
What are his feelings on open source? That’s my question.
If you’re using the same UI and metadata, you should be able to reproduce images with only slight differences and then upscale them with hires fix or something else.
They tried to make video game rentals illegal in the US. They’ve always been a shitty, anti-consumer company.
Nintendo has always been an underhanded bully. This isn’t new.
Doesn’t seem like it.
That’s kind of unbelievable given what they say it can do.
They said they would be open sourcing it.
That was really cool.
Those might just be LoRA merged models, not full fine-tuning. From what I heard, fine-tuning doesn’t work because the models are distilled. You’d have to find a way to undistill them to train them.
Last I heard, LoRAs cause catastrophic forgetting in the model, and full fine-tuning doesn’t really work.
You can never learn anything with these clickbait headlines.
I don’t think so. They’re going to have to do a lot better than a tutorial to win people back. That said, the two Flux models being distilled making them close to impossible to fine-tune sucks too.
Or just not show people what you’re typing.
Titanic vs. Bismark. Who would win?