

The classic method of murdering random innocent people and claiming they deserved to die for whatever reason after they’re dead. Conservatives fall for it every single time.


The classic method of murdering random innocent people and claiming they deserved to die for whatever reason after they’re dead. Conservatives fall for it every single time.


If this is her motivation it’s extremely encouraging. So many elected Democrats have demonstrated their cowardice consistently for many years. If the cowardly move is now to yield to voter pressure rather than to donor pressure it can only be a good thing.


Too often this option is presented by people who are deliberately manipulating you and causing you to think that you only have the two choices which each benefit them and neither you. Always consider who is offering this choice and why. The true lesser evil here is whatever you have to do to get out of the situation where this choice is being presented to you.
Kirk had a pretty animated speaking style, which is what I meant by moving. He could have leaned forward, backward, or turned which may not have affected him being hit at all but would definitely affect whether his vitals were hit. It looks like the shooter waited until it seemed he would not move this way. You’re right though. The more I learn about it the more it seems like the shot placement wasn’t exactly intentional and the deadliness of the shot wasn’t assured. I have heard that it was windy that day, but not more than an experienced Utah deer hunter would be able to account for. My argument was only intended to support that the shooter was skilled whether their skill was from hunting or otherwise.
The shooter’s setup and escape seem to me to be more professional, but this sense of mine is more from contrasting other assassinations and attempts I’m aware of. This one is appears far more informed and effective than average. The escape into a field itself wasn’t special, but planning and knowing a good spot to shoot from and be likely to escape from is what I’m looking at. They could have gotten lucky of course.
The two captured suspects are also suspicious. The first one arrested was shouting that he was the shooter and to arrest him, while the other suspect was walking around with a pellet gun. These could also be coincidences but they definitely helped distract the searchers.
Good point. I edited it for clarity.
A 200 yard shot on a moving target, accounting for windage and bullet drop for a single-shot kill and immediate successful egress? I have to emphasize this.
Personal grievance is definitely believable as a potential motive, epspecially considering Kirk’s career was exclusively to cause grievance.
The factor that would be atypical with this as the motive is the calculation, planning, and skill which was utilized in this shooting. Asassins who kill people only tangentially involved in the cause of their grievance tend to act rashly in all areas of their plan. In any terrible position that Kirk has supported I can’t think of any instance where he wasn’t a secondary or tertiary instigator. I would think someone with the clarity of mind to coordinate a successful assassination and ostensibly baffle the FBI with their escape may also have spent some time determing who is most culpable in their grievance. That being said Kirk could have found himself at the intersection of percieved culpability and accessibility.
At this point all most of us have is speculation and reasoned guesses. I can’t claim to be totally certain about any of this. However, seeing that this shooting has several times the coverage of the factually terroristic murder of a Democratic State Senator which did have an immediately tangible political effect, it seems clear to me which political movement is most supported and protected in these assassinations.


The actual bubble that needs to be popped is financialization. The US economy is now completely detached from productivity and is now running on speculation only through financial valuation. At the same time, people are starving, infrastructure is falling apart, the birth rate is plummeting, and suicide is on the rise. It’s time to stop taking “job creators” seriously and use all this fallow professional experience and skill to restart the material economy and forget this pretend crap that keeps plutocrats busy doing nothing of any value to anyone.


This is really interesting. Faking an endorsement by someone who is accused of preventing thousands of needless deaths to sell shirts is on one level nefarious but on another level incorporating Luigi into mainstream pop culture. The plutocracy wants people to think this kid is the worst monster who ever lived, but the average American is so pleased with what he is accused of doing his likeness can be used to sell clothing. I am not totally opposed to the mainstreaming of this kind of folk hero. Optimally he should at least get some royalties to pay for his legal fees, though.


It’s an inhuman facsimile of the expression of humanity.
China has for decades deliberately designed their economy to provide affordable and quality labor to the capitalist world, and in all of the English speaking world capitalists are free to invest their money however they please wherever they please. Since it is cheaper to produce and import particular similar quality products from China than produce them domestically, that is what the right business move would be to minimize costs to maximize profit.
Lived communally for years. It really depends on who else is living with you in the community because you must cooperate with them. The system works really well and I recommend anyone try out living in one for a while, but it’s very different than living individualistically. That being said it can also work too well and you may find yourself not leaving or interacting outside the commune for weeks or months at a time and falling out of contact with the outside world.


This is not a universal phenomenon. This is the result of stress affecting sleep by causing sleep latency problems or the quality of the sleep itself leaving the individual non-refreshed upon waking and needing a refractory period to recover from sleeping before getting out of bed. The reason it’s coming up a lot more often is that greater numbers of people are experiencing the health consequences of chronic stress.


This is everyone’s problem. Donald Trump is openly conspiring with the State of Texas to steal the 2026 midterms through the legal corruption of gerrymandering. This is an off-census redistricting which is unnecessary, unusual, and obviously for nefarious reasons. Texas democrats have fled the state to prevent quorum, which removes the ability for Texas to complete this coup de gras of the entire United States. This will have an extremely harmful effect on national politics if Texas is allowed to do this.


If it brings me pleasure it is something I need, as I need to enjoy my life. On something like this I would just think about whether the cost justifies the amount of pleasure it would bring me. If I know I would get tired of it after a few weeks, I’m not going to blow thousands on it. If it’s a major enhancement of a hobby I’ve had for a long time which deepens my ability to enjoy it and I’m not risking anything else by spending the money, then it’s a decent investment in my happiness.


And the Nintendo of my childhood was responsible for pretty much every anti-consumer practice and cultural trend concerning videogames during my childhood:
Inventing the idea that videogames are toys only for little boys only for marketing purposes. Betraying and exploiting established relationships with developers. Screwing over partners on disc technology and reversing course to limit technology to be under their control. Supporting Jack Thompson throughout his campaign to ban all videogames with any adult content at all. Lawsuit after lawsuit after lawsuit to hold the entire industry back. The list goes on.


Tinder is an app where you look at pictures of people and on that basis alone decide whether to go out. It’s even easier to lie about height than to take a misleading picture. I’m really not sure if this would make any difference at all. Everyone frustrated on tinder will continue to be exactly as frustrated on tinder while tinder squeezes them all.


They could be having that effect. Scams that look obvious are to attract people who fall for obvious scams, such as people with dementia. They are designed to be transparent to most people because they don’t need anybody clicking that has the faculties to know better than to fall for the rest of the scam.
The Republicans need pedophile votes, so they legally protect pedophilic behavior.