

28·
4 hours agoThe “no duty to protect” doctrine. Our news doesn’t even have to be factual.
The “no duty to protect” doctrine. Our news doesn’t even have to be factual.
We also reward people who can memorize and regurgitate even if they don’t understand what they are doing.
Yeah dealing with these people was my point. I’m not sure why I’m getting downvoted for saying the same thing as you.
Oh that’s right ::gestures to my username::
That would make them a martyr and just cause more turds to float to the surface so we can fill even more ditches. Sounds like a good plan.
This lady won with 73% of the vote in 2020, 71% in 2022, and unopposed in 2024. She is exactly what the people in that area want and that’s sad. The US is like social media. It’s not the platform it’s the users that make it garbage.
It is. If you aren’t explicit you are malicious just in case. It’s just weird that I wasn’t being sarcastic and people took it that way, but when I’m sarcastic without tags people take it literally.
I go through phases of recoiling and isolating and like an idiot I poke my head back in to realize everyone has gotten worse. I’m an idiot.