My whole comment was that I’m not sure what the point is, because that’s not how it works in reality. So if you actually want to know, you’ll have to ask the author of the comment above me.

But if the best of what you can do with it doesn’t make sense, then why do it? It’s not like it’s helping, just distracting from the parts that DO work.

And kind of the same thing again: The universe wasn’t born with forms, either.

When we did a project for a redesign of our web app at work, when I showed stuff to the UXer he said “I see this is designed by a programmer. Because a programmer says: But it works.”

And indeed, that is how all of the comments I read here feel; that things like a denounced search are just irrelevant toys, instead of a solid part of the toolkit of a professional modern developer.

To make it “pretty”? That’s more CSS I would say, and JS would be more about UX.

Which I haven’t seen anybody here mention. Which is kinda giving antisocial nerds with hobby projects? I mean, in professional development you learn very quickly how ux is correlated to helpdesk tickets.

Like, we can talk about technical purity excercises all day, but code doesn’t exist for its own sake.

You ask the librarian how often the word “arrow” is in Lord of the Rings, and they have to tell you?

Already any plans for becoming childless?

I’m sure many of us would prefer “Fuck you, Endymion”.

I assure you Canadians and Mexicans do not want to be called Americans, especially these days

Yeah the thing is that each part of “public static void” is a feature. Which other languages don’t have.

Still makes a good meme for programmers who are not experienced enough to know that.