No. It won’t.

If you say the words “jury nullification” before you’re selected, you’ll 100% be disqualified. If you say it after you’re selected… you’ll probably still be disqualified. There’s really no reason at all to say those words anywhere near an actual jury. But you can explain the idea, carefully, and maybe not too explicitly.

A jury is the final arbiter of the law. If you decide that throwing a sandwich does not constitute assault, then it’s not assault.

Because the Justice department is being run by headlines and idiots.

We’ll see. They still have to live in this world, and they were already rich.

I’ll guess it won’t have been worth it in the end, even for them.

Because I wanted a reliable source of news and they offered it for $2 a month.

I also want to support real journalism.

Welp. I had cancelled after the last debacle, but resubbed on an extremely cheap offer.

I guess I’ll have to cancel again.

It’ll sometimes do dumb and/or redundant or too complicated shit. Pile up a couple of those and your codebase can get unmaintainable fast.

I find if you give it small chunks and keep an eye on it, it’s great.

I think one of my recent prompts was “Create a procedure that creates an example configuration file with placeholder values. If a config file doesn’t exist on start, give a warning and create the example config.”

It also works great as a replacement for an ORM.

I understand how to turn the results of a select statement into an update statement, but the AI does it a hell of a lot faster.

I find if you give it small enough chunks, it’s easy enough to review. And even if you do have to correct, it’s generally easier to correct than it would be to write it all by hand.

Also applies when the dev could know what they’re doing, but just doesn’t care to.

Wasn’t congestion pricing a huge success that most everyone actually living there appreciates?

They’re probably more responsible than he is. He can’t do any of this without Congress, neither can the Supreme Court.

He’s one person. There are hundreds of Republican Congressmen and Senators endorsing his actions, and celebrating the end of the rule of law.

Yeah, you use whichever you want and just worry about it less.

Why? Because

you want to whitewash his history while it’s in the media and in pop culture. After it’s out of pop culture, then historians can find the truth.

The roots of America are a long trend away from these things.

maybe you should go there and verify.

Convenient timing with the Epstein book coming out this weekend. Man that thing is creepy.

Tell that to France.

The left is notoriously unarmed

Heh. The left talks about their guns less. They don’t have guns on their Christmas cards with their kids as part of their identity.

But there are plenty of leftists with guns.

Especially this one.

I’m not intending to leave my country to the Nazis.

Well, not voluntarily. There’s a difference.