• 3 Posts
  • 84 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: July 3rd, 2023

help-circle
  • This is the exact same argument that I see used against EVs almost daily, while the people making these calls for “better analysis” ignore the dodgy mining practices and literal wars that are the result of oil extraction. But let’s go back to fireworks. I spent all of 30 seconds Googling and found this. I’m sure it’s far from an exhaustive list of firework ingredients but it’s a decent start. Highlights include:

    Sulfur - extracted from oil and natural gas.

    Aluminum - 28% of US aluminum comes from recycled sources, which is great, but any that goes into fireworks is then lost forever. The rest of it comes from mines in Canada and Jamaica.

    Iron and copper - Mined domestically and both are recyclable but gone forever once they’re exploded.

    Strontium - Mined in Mexico.

    Barium - Mined in China.

    Sodium - Mined in Chile and Peru.

    How come you’re not asking for a better analysis of the mining practices for the ores extracted in Jamaica, Mexico, China, Chile, and Peru? How much of anything that makes up your average firework, including cardboard and plastic, is recycled at the end of that firework’s life? How many fireworks are reusable even once let alone tens or even hundreds of times? Much like with oil burning cars, these things are ignored because they’ve been around for a long time and it’s normalised. Meanwhile emerging technologies, while demonstrably cleaner/better in pretty much every metric, are held to impossible standards that the old tech gets a free pass on.

    No, we don’t recycle much lithium yet but it’s a new technology and battery recycling plants are springing up all over the place all the time, and these same plants often deal in the various other electronic materials that you cited. How much used petroleum is recycled each year? How many fireworks?

    I don’t want to argue and I should probably just delete this rather than posting it, having said my piece to myself, but perhaps I’m my own worst enemy…





  • Synology has Container Manager, which is their GUI frontend for Docker, so if it’ll run in Docker it’ll run on a Syno NAS. I’m running Pihole on mine just fine.

    As for the M.2 drives, you can use non-Synology ones as storage. Don’t quote me on it but I’ve a feeling it “just works” in the EU where they’re not allowed to force you to use specific brands, but if it doesn’t then there’s a script that removes the restriction: https://github.com/007revad/Synology_enable_M2_volume

    You should check their repo as they have other useful scripts. I’m using the one that enables dedupe on non-SSD volumes myself.




  • I’m using plenty of containers, accelerated and otherwise, but I also want a full-blown desktop that I can access from wherever. Even on a wired LAN, streaming that desktop is slow and laggy when it’s hosted on my NAS, which I think is due to the lack of hardware acceleration on that system. I want to move the VM to a host that has that feature (currently running Ubuntu Server) but I need a hypervisor that doesn’t require its own desktop system to be installed in order to manage it.

    Plenty of good replies here to help me though.










  • TedZanzibar@feddit.uktoMemes@lemmy.mlI hate these icons
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    you’re absolutely making things up

    I could tell you what I see but you wouldn’t believe me anyway.

    I was trying to show that not everyone perceives the world around them in the same way, and most people find it fascinating when they take a step back to really think about it. But you’ve already decided that simply not being able to see colors in the same way as you makes me inherently wrong, so I’m not going to engage any further.


  • TedZanzibar@feddit.uktoMemes@lemmy.mlI hate these icons
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    Yes I understand the meme and I’m not trying to get into an argument. I’m just trying to educate as to why relying on color as the primary differentiator is not a solution to the problem as proposed.

    at a glance, color is a much faster tool we use to identify these icons

    Think about what you’re saying here, and consider how ridiculous it would sound if you said that to someone who was completely blind.

    Sure, to a “color normal” person, something’s color is a great differentiator, but even when using a colorblind friendly pallette it’s just far easier for us to distinguish different shapes than colors. We’ve spent our whole lives adapting to a lack of color information so asking us to be able to work purely on color alone is like asking a blind person to see.

    Again, and this part is really important and oft overlooked - this applies even when a designer has gone out of their way to choose a colorblind friendly pallette. It’s just not that easy for us. I honestly couldn’t even tell you what Google’s corporate pallette is without looking and I’m sure that information is second nature to normies.


  • TedZanzibar@feddit.uktoMemes@lemmy.mlI hate these icons
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    Nope. The icons are honestly good enough as they are, but the original post was being disingenuous in suggesting they’re no more distinguishable than squares.

    Running with that logic, having each square a different color does not solve the problem for those of us who can’t easily distinguish those colors.