• 94 Posts
  • 5.18K Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: June 14th, 2023

help-circle

  • The lesson is that people don’t have the time or attention to fact check, and frankly I think we should have known that.

    Why bother to fact check any one thing when it means hunting for the single edible chocolate in a pile of rabbit shit?

    You can’t even fucking Google an answer anymore, as the AI generated response is trained on all the bad data that’s bloated the system.

    Objective morality in terms of universal human rights and behavioral science can be integrated into a better regulated social media, for example. It just has to be more appealing somehow and easier to access. It also has to be sexy and come with some status, and other benefits.

    I would settle for it being a view that won’t get you expelled from a college campus, primaried out of an elected office, or purged from a high profile business position.









  • There’s a staunch libertarian view on Lemmy, wherein people will advocate for personal liberty ahead of technological progress. The Country Mouse has it better than the City Mouse, because he can own a gun and drive a big truck and smoke weed without the neighbors ratting him out to the cops. The lack of basic amenities - subways and school systems and high speed internet and big medical centers - is worth the increased personal autonomy.

    The “Serfs had it better” trope takes this to its logical conclusion. Rolling back the technological frontier 500 years is worth it, because the surveillance/police state and the corporate oligopoly even on the fringe of society is seriously that bad.

    I don’t agree. But I can’t really argue against it. This is just a personal preference. Its not any kind of objective truth.






  • My real point is that if they had been more subtle Lincoln would absolutely have let them keep slavery.

    Lincoln wouldn’t have enjoyed the majorities necessary to rewrite the Constitution without the Civil War. He’d have been in the same position as Quincy Adams or Filmore, two outspoken abolitionists who lacked the tools to functionally end the practice.

    The war, the voluntary dissolution of opposition in Congress, and the massive depopulation that neutered immediate blowback left the door wide open for revolutionary change. And Lincoln - unlike his successor Johnson or even more distant successor Truman - walked through that doorway. That’s what makes Lincoln significant - he was presented with a serious opportunity to affect change and he took it, when less lucky presidents never had the opportunity and less moral presidents never had the conviction.

    A lesson the modern South seems to understand well if the last few decades of the Republican party are any example.

    What makes guys like Trump and Bush Jr so horrifying is the fact that they did pounce on their opportunities to affect radical change. The Republican Party is seizing their moment and reinventing the country while the Dems dither, trying to extract as much personal profit from the decaying system.

    The modern South is a consequence of bold Republicans capitalizing on a wellspring of white nationalism that’s been bubbling up since the Civil Rights Era, while Democrats seek to apologize for FDR/Kennedy/LBJ and sell off a generation of progressive reform to the highest bidder. When you look at the Dem strategy in states like Texas and Florida, you see this in spades. Candidates falling over themselves to prove they hate student protesters and brown foreigners and union advocates as much as any Republican.

    The lesson we’re all learning is that you might as well try to reign in hell, cause heaven is a lost cause.






  • Lincoln was totally willing to keep slavery to end the civil war.

    The thing about Lincoln wasn’t that he was willing to keep slavery to end the war. Virtually everyone was willing to do that.

    Lincoln was willing to end slavery to end the war. This was the truly revolutionary view and the reason he’s so celebrated.

    So he freed the southern slaves and ordered the South burned to the ground instead

    I don’t think you get to rampage all the way into Gettysburg, looting and burning and raping and massacring your way straight through the heart of the Midwest, and then discover moralism during Sherman’s March.

    He wasn’t the abolitionist hero American history portrays him as.

    He literally was, though. He wielded abolition, first as a weapon to bleed the Confederacy dry and then as a sucture to knit a new nation out of the 13th-15th amendments.

    He achieved policy the most radical abolitionists hadn’t even dreamed of ten years prior. An absolute living legend.

    If only he’d made Butler his VP or… idk… ducked.