• 1 Post
  • 8 Comments
Joined 8 months ago
cake
Cake day: January 12th, 2025

help-circle
  • Very well. Since privacy is irrelevant, give me your full name and address. I promise I won’t report you to ICE.

    If you think you can organize a resistance to fascism while being surveilled 24/7, be my guest. The only thing you’re doing by being a stupid doomer is discouraging people from taking proactive steps towards better privacy. Surveillance is what kills our freedom of speech, assembly, and petition.

    It’s funny how much people deny that privacy is the foundation of freedom when every tyrant knows it. That’s why they set up surveillance systems.


  • No, the state can’t just do that. They could do it to any one person, but not to everyone. Consider this hypothetical: the state wants to kill 100 people. If everyone is outside, this job becomes easy. If everyone is in their homes, this job becomes harder. Why? Because breaking down doors, moving equipment, etc. costs money. And government agencies don’t have all the money in the world! They can’t:

    1. Go after every single person who uses cash
    2. Go after everyone who uses a vpn
    3. Go after everyone who uses encrypted messaging
    4. Go after everyone who attends a protest and who wears a mask and puts their phone in a faraday bag.

    Privacy works best in a larger group. Telling people privacy is dead actually hurts you more than telling people that there are indeed effective steps you can take to protect yourself.




  • Your number one step is privacy. Privacy is the foundation of freedom; it “protects the right to be left alone”.

    If you’re a beginner, Naomi Brockwell’s videos have very good tips. If you’re not a beginner, read Michael Bazzell’s book Extreme Privacy. Read it in full and decide the level of privacy you want (you likely will not need every single one of his tips).



  • WindAqueduct@lemmy.mltoMemes@lemmy.mlTalking to liberals
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    4 days ago

    Yes, people should have that, but it’s not that simple. Some liberals, particularly classical liberals, think a free market would bring those things to everyone. I don’t necessarily disagree, though I think free markets can only ever be free under communism/socialism, not capitalism. The issue with centrally planned, universal healthcare is that a hostile government could refuse to provide you care, much like insurance companies that don’t approve coverage for many things. Additionally, there needs to be strong medical privacy protections.