This is a pretty old template iirc

Mountain Dew float with chocolate chocolate chip ice cream vs covfefe and hamberders, battle of the century

On twitter.com presumably

Most desktops have a graphical startup editor

The probability of getting BOOG88 is the same as any other random series, but the chances of getting a random series that also has two extremist dogwhistles is very small

Thanks! I doubt I’ll get a response or find out anything that happens, but hopefully this asshole at least needs to replace their plates.

I’m sorry you had to find out this way

Sure, I’m not saying this is smoking gun proof beyond a shadow of a doubt, but at the same time, it would be one hell of a coincidence.

yep, they call it “being crypto” or “hiding their power level”

Apparently it is not the standard design for an Indiana plate, so it must be a custom. Plus, the chances of randomly getting BOOG88 have got to be pretty small.

how’s this look

How many Kias can possibly be sold on a Wednesday morning, in Indiana

Well his number is right there, someone can give him a call…

It says BOOG, as in boogaloo, as in Civil War 2: Electric Boogaloo

I don’t think community policing is state violence.

Linux has been dead simple for 15 years now

So you expect every marginalized group to have their own personal cops?

That is so clearly not what I’m saying, have a good day.

>This is what Israel is using white phosphorus for, but the article is biased and never mentions it

<After rights groups accused Israel of war crimes for its use of white phosphorus in its 2008-09 Gaza offensive, the Israeli military said it would stop using it as smokescreen munitions in built-up areas, with unspecified exceptions.

The US and many other countries use white phosphorus based smoke munitions too, and it is not a war crime

That is true, but using it as an incendiary weapon in civilian areas is.

If you don’t like Al Jazeera, here’s another source.

on a smaller scale it’s harder to form a group that would argue for necessary support for these people

Idk, I kinda gotta disagree with that. Sure, mob violence against “undesirables” is always gonna be a problem, but communities know each other and are less likely to see different constituent groups as “outsiders”

But in this specific example, where we are talking about “how do we decide who gets to use violence to keep the peace,” I think community-based democratic approaches are the best option.

I also gotta disagree with

that community will still have its marginalized groups that don’t get representation

because by definition, if there is a marginalized group, they are not part of that community, and instead would form their own peacekeepers, like Guardian Angels.

Obviously there is a benefit to federalization, I’m not arguing for nor do I support statelessness, but I think if democracy is emphasized from the ground up, those issues naturally tend to erode. Like I think the core problem which necessitates the federal government stepping in to ensure rights comes from a lack of democracy.

Oh wait I just reinvented violence of the state hehe

Except if the state is a community voting on how they should be policed, it isn’t really violence, is it?