KDE does have a disk usage utility. It’s called Filelight

Good to know. Thank you.

It’s only the Linux client that’s getting open sourced. NordVPN also offers dedicated client apps for various proprietary desktop and mobile OSes, and those clients remain proprietary themselves.

Hmm. That feels suspicious. It’s as if they are deliberately trying to get the more techy Linux users over.

Welp, I guess it needs some more development time.

Why not use something like Angelfish instead of Firefox?

I use Aegis on my phone.

I haven’t released the source code yet. The private repo at the moment is very messy in general so I am just waiting until I get a somewhat working pre-alpha done with the design that I am still experimenting with finalized. There’s still a ton of work to be done since I just started 2 weeks ago.

Yep. I did use those endpoints with the ModeratorView (The bot doesn’t need posts or comments from communities it doesn’t moderate) on my first attempt. I went with the federation approach at last because of future scalability issues. Though that is probably an exaggeration. If the default rate limit is 180 read requests per minute, that would be more than enough, honestly. The scale at which the scalability issues I mentioned would appear at about more than 4500 comments/posts per minute. Frankly, I think we’ll never reach that in the near future. So actually the rate limiting issue is practically not an issue for the foreseeable future.

The plugin system would work. The fetching problem would disappear.

Though I don’t think the federation code would be huge. I am not trying to make it compatible with all platforms. For example I’ll write the required Lemmy ActivityPub structs to send moderation related activities and actors. The Group’s instance would handle distributing the activities, so even though this project might not federate with Piefed for example, it would still receive the activities the bot sends to the Group’s inbox through the instance’s software, Lemmy.

If someone wanted to get the bot to work on another Ap platform that supports groups, they would have to write the necessary Ap actors, activities, and a bit of glue code, and that would be it… or at least that’s how I’m planning it.

I guess I’ll try to work with the plugin system if I can’t achieve what I want and keep it simple. It would at least be a learning experience, if nothing else. Thank you for the info.

Well, my initial idea was to build this only for lemmy and yes it would be easier that way if I didn’t care about scalability.

However, the API was not good enough for my use case. Polling new posts and comments was my main issue with it. So mostly scaling issues. You could miss some posts and comments. The amount of API requests would get bigger with the amount of communities the bot moderates. There are also some problems with the rate limits.

They can be solved by directly querying the database, but who’s going to give you database access? So you’d have to host lemmy yourself just for the bot. And I’d imagine the database would grow pretty fast with the number of communities. I explicitly do not want to store any posts or comments.

Another solution would be using Lemmy’s new webhook system, but I don’t know how reliable it will be.

So I stopped halfway through and started a new project with new goals:

• Make a new federated platform

With federation, the problems above would be solved. This also allows it to be hosted without having to find a suitable Lemmy instance for it or even self host one yourself.

• Stronger integration with platforms via a modular federation system

If I made it depend on Lemmy, a strong integration with other platforms wouldn’t be possible. Piefed has features that Lemmy doesn’t, for example. People can maintain a set of platform specific activitypub structs and enable the bot to federate with that platform.

Not really answering your question, but I’d like to make a clarification: The bots will only be able to operate within the boundaries of the communities they are appointed to (or I guess groups). They cannot manage any instances. Furthermore, my main intention is for them to be used primarily as moderation bots, but they can also be used as general purpose bots within the community.

The platform should provide some of these out of the box, in my opinion.

I am trying to build a new activitypub powered platform just for user scriptable moderation bots, but I am stuck on the modular federation design.

This is my third attempt now.

best game ever made. just take my money

Tell your friend to compile the game for Linux as well.

Is that the whole log? Have you enabled the trace level?

The best way is to try and make projects you want to make.

It is important to make ones that you really want to do yourself. I don’t know how it is with the others, but I immediately got demotivated after a day of trying to develop something someone else made just for the sake of learning.

In my experience, you will learn better and faster by developing things you actually want to develop. And you will also be rewarded with a good amount of dopamine.

They recommend people other american centralized social media as an alternative to Bluesky in response to this, yet again. When are they going to learn?

Is that so? Have a nice day, bud.

Why are you blaming Peertube for its unpopularity?

You can’t write your own docs? Well, I guess nobody would use your shitty project anyway. Probably generated by an agent as well.

The name of this project is at least accurrate, but I have my suspicions that it is also generated by AI. OP, are you the “dev” of this?

eOS is based on aosp though.

Weird. does piefed.world have federation problems? No instance I checked has the updated link in it, not even lemmy.world. I can see that it indeed has been updated in piefed.world, but not in other instances.