NFTs are basically Bitcoin and fall under fake money for criminals.

I had to have a friend help me because a company I bought from only did customer support through Instagram.

Moves the current line up 2 lines.

It’s “2” because the syntax is actually “move to after -2”. So if you are on line 20, it will move you to after line 18… Aka line 19

:m-2

^K Cut and ^U Uncut (paste) were on the screen the WHOLE time this happened.

“The instructions are on screen at all times!” is only a positive if you follow the instructions, otherwise they are wasting space.

Captcha isn’t about what is real or not real. It’s about training ML models to appear more humanlike based on soliciting actual human responses.

The strong irony is that when high core count and asymmetrical multi-CCD chips started rolling out, they were having CCD pinning issues in windows. But since Linux has a scheduler that has been NUMA awareness for ages… Linux was actually just fine with these things.

Linux was actually better for bleeding edge hardware for once.

I built a new 9950x3d + x870e system last year. trying to use the motherboard’s wifi would kernel panic things. couldnt turn bluetooth on and off. couldn’t control the RGB.

Now, WiFi works great. Bluetooth works great. OpenRGB supports the RGB. Things are great. Took time to get here, but we got here.

I wrote the original reply as a joke. Clearly we’re not playing by any sort of rules here. so worrying about the difference between digit and number is kinda funny. but then I thought it would be fun to actually drastically overthink it and be overly pedantic about what the question says.

So no, not bitter. I just have a very bad sense of humor and find dumb things entertaining.

And from what I can tell based on the callout at the end… This is a line from connector which is a compatibility layer that allows running Fabric mods on Neoforge.

Which means connector is going to be included in every stack trace, regardless of how related it is to the problem. It will be the one to raise the errors that couldn’t be caught and managed… But AI will see connector being the one probably flagging the errors and be more likely to tag it as a “suspected” mod. I wouldn’t be shocked to find out that AI has a tendency to shoot the messenger.

Now isn’t the time to start being pedantic about rules.

edit: the prompt says “Circle the smallest number” and not “Circle the smallest number that appears below”. What is the smallest number? 0 (at least by magnitude, negative numbers are just bigger numbers in the negative direction). So the prompt effectively says “Circle the zero”

If we’re going to work off the “that appears below” assumption. then the smallest number is “1” and not 1, 2, and 3. So circling all 3 is incorrect.

If we’re going to work off “that appears below, not including the categories” then the number to circle is 15 specifically. Not the “2.” in front of it.

And if there is a “circle the category indicator number for the category that includes the smallest number below” implication, then it’s truly just a bad question. Make it clear what you want.

There is a 0 in the bottom row. That is the smallest number. That’s why these were all wrong. Also it says number singular and they circled all 3

“I tried to keylog myself and the system doesn’t support keylogging.” is a frustrating situation. Because it’s neat from a security perspective and absolutely maddening from basically every other one.

When they say repeated, they mean repeated for all time ever. Has someone ever used the phrase “how are you today?” … yes. Has someone ever used the phrase “Pablo Picasso is my favorite brand of watermelon” before? Probably not. There are probably a lot of phrases with varying levels of “have existed before”. That previous sentence might be an entirely original one.

But there are plenty of other sentences that can be conveyed that actually exchange information but don’t generate new sentences. “So, what do you do for work?” “My favorite color is green” are almost certainly not new sentences.

A better breakdown of my sequence of numbers with the exact same values might be

1, 1, 2, 3,
1, 1, 4, 5,
1, 1, 6, 7,
1, 1, 8, 9
1, 1,
1, 1,
1

And now you have a repeated intro section per line and a sequence of totally unique numbers to that line.

“Most numbers are repeated” could mean that if you pick any given number from all the 21 numbers, it more than 50% likely to be a “1” you pick, just because 1 shows up so often.

“Most numbers are NOT repeated” could mean that if you if you pick any given number from the 9 unique numbers that show up in the set, you are 88% likely to pick a number that only exists once. But if any of these numbers were to be repeated even once, for any reason, that part stops being true.

In language, this just means that some phrases are going to be purely templates like “Hello” but some phrases are informational without being new: “I like turtles” and some are completely never happened before.

And depending on where your mental anchoring is, “we have a lot of repeated phrases in our lives, how could MOST sentences be new” or “repeating things would get old” … that stat may be hard to believe or surprising, or very obvious.

“Hello, how are you?” has been repeated plenty. But after that things start to vary.

In the sequence of numbers 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9… Most numbers only appear once even though most numbers are a repeat.

• There are 9 possible numbers and most (88%) of them are not repeats
• “1” accounts for most (60%) of the entries in the sequence.

If we assume “hi, how are you?” is “1” and most sentences are another number, we can see how even with common phrases being repeated frequently, most sentences may tend to be original.

(I’ve not done the math and I’ve definitely not studied language enough to say how dubious or accurate the claim is, you just piqued my interest and I started trying to rationalize it all)

I agree. But that’s wrong because lying about current events is wrong. This is what I meant about framework. AI is a tool in that regard and not the problem. There is plenty of “real” journalism out there spreading lies too that I have problems with.

I’m fortunate I guess that most of the AI slop I dismiss is things more akin to baby panda sneezing scares mom panda. Where it doesn’t REALLY matter if it’s real because there are no consequences. It’s either funny or it’s not.

If someone were to say to you “why did the chicken cross the road?” You wouldn’t demand that there is actually a chicken. You would accept it as a framework for a joke.

The same holds true for staged videos or AI or anything. Is the framework important to the point? A video claiming people can fly and using AI as proof… That’s problematic. A staged bit where it would still be funny if it was just told verbally by a standup comedian? Who cares how real it is, the realness was never the point, the concept of the situation was.

Almost all comedy movies are just long staged bits.

And “how funny would this be if a standup comedian told this as a joke” vs “the context of this potentially actually happening is very important to the underlying humor of it” is a variable line for people. And that’s ok. Unless someone is in danger (don’t let someone jump off a cliff because ai said they can fly), other people’s lines don’t really affect you

I don’t disagree. But cooling performance does impact CPU performance in some cases even without “overclocking”

And in very hot running chips, it can start to matter.

Boost clocks depend on thermal headroom. Better cooling will get you better performance still, even if you aren’t manually over clocking.

You do know that you don’t have to change distros to change DE right?