This is what “sanewashing” refers to, if anyone was unclear on that.
Well at least the other shapes will be able to go in to pull him out.
The fuck you talking about?
Why isn’t Michael Bloomberg on here? He’s worth more than all these combined.
I watched this clip (the token liberal Jessica Tarlov schooled the rest of them) and he was pretty clearly joking. Fuck Jesse Watters, but this ain’t it.
In hindsight, there may have been signs…
Somewhere between 7 and 12, depending on the kind of coffee.
Maybe that’s been the joke for centuries. The rapture happened but nobody made the cut. Seems consistent with the Bible.
Seems like we’ve reached the point where most voters realize that virtually all government shutdowns have been the Republicans’ fault.
Being above the fray is what the Supreme Court was intended to be, so you can’t fault people for initially assuming that.
I think most people actually do.
Since the Roe v Wade verdict was leaked, I feel like the media has been glossing over the revelation that there’s just as much wheeling and dealing in the Supreme Court as in any of the other branches.
Why are we giving Trump an excuse to drop his failure of a running mate?
Make sure it’s a duck you’re taking home and not a goose. The goose will fuck you up.
Keep talking, dumbass. Let’s see how many swifties you can make turn out.
You’re confusing neutrality with objectivity.
Edit: Neutral (adjective): not helping or supporting either side in a conflict, disagreement, etc.
Are you a big enough baby to downvote because you don’t like what words mean? Neutrality and correctness are two different things. Objectivity does factor in what the facts are, neutrality doesn’t.
Seems like a problem springing from the press’s bias towards neutrality, or how sometimes a politician is objectively wrong but the press treats them with kid gloves for fear of being accused of unfairness.
They can’t print Trump’s entire 3 minute rant, and they’re scared to characterize it as meandering or incoherent, even if that’s the best description. So, they print a single line from his rant and provide their own context.
internal communication on platforms like Slack is not always private
That’s common sense, frankly.
No matter what he says, I’m still voting for her.