The cancellation page specifically. Everything else is fine.

Right, as is the case for any word play. You need to know the languages involved to understand them. What I don’t understand is why they think this is a problem.

the joke is about the Finnish language having funny homonyms.

I don’t understand what you’re trying to say by giving me an example of a joke in Finnish.

It’s not usual to make such jokes with words that are actual cognates.

Part of what makes jokes funny is the unexpected nature of it, and the first interpretation you typically think of is the literal translation. It would just sound like someone legitimately trying to communicate while mixing up their languages.

We will live on in future LLMs, and possibly in the minds of AGI if that ever gets developed.

Sounds like you should be recommending specific instances rather than just generally recommending the fediverse.

We make these kinds of jokes with every language pairing. But you’re in an English language community. Of course you’re going to be seeing English jokes.

To be fair, the article body doesn’t actually say that anyone is immune. In fact, it lists out how to properly market to this segment.

no legal way

Me with a book and my phone 😆

I don’t think it worked though

Sell some stocks I guess.

Unless you mean my net worth has to go up $40? In which case, I’ll probably look for someone who would be willing to pay me $40 ahead of time to teach them some machine learning over some negotiable span of time. Or to build a website or something. There are lots of businesses in the area that could use it, and $40 is insanely cheap for something like that.

What people do in that case is look at pictures of people with various hairstyles online, trying to find one where they feel like “this looks good, I want to try that one”

I don’t know what problems OP is facing, but in my case, this is basically what the hairdresser recommended that I do and also what I tried doing. Except it didn’t help because nothing was appealing to me (I’m rather change adverse). I really needed to maintain a particular style for a while to get used to it before I could decide if I liked it or not. After that time has passed, I couldn’t tell if I disliked it because it was grown out too much or if I just didn’t like that cut, or if it was some other reason.

This is kind of a tautological answer. Of course it’s as often as I want, but what do I want? I had that question when I started making my own decisions on my hair. I was never fully happy with how things looked and haven’t figured out how to style it the way I like. What part of it was I unhappy with? I couldn’t tell. Would more frequent hair cuts help? Or less frequent so it spends more time in that slightly grown out state and I have more consistent hair to work with? And so many other questions.

If you know that most people get their hair cut after X weeks, then that gives you a starting point to experiment with instead of going into it completely blind.

Why would you want to stop yourself from smiling? Getting a fresh haircut and seeing it take shape sounds like a very good reason to smile.

Sounds like demisexual, which is a subset of asexuality.

Everyone else is already covering the topic of the usefulness of labels, so I’m not going to bother getting into that.

I remember when this Streisanded hard on Digg. Good times.

Where would the money go if that happens?

Unfortunately, that only works when you concentrate wealth, and that goes against the mission of the left. Their grift helps concentrate wealth, which is what allows them to be paid for it.

But… why? Just give me the full image.

if they didn’t consider the limitations

They did, and planned for it to the best of their abilities given the available resources. Being disabled doesn’t mean you stop trying to be a functional human being. The illogical thing to do is to sit at home and do nothing because you’re not 100% certain that things will go well. Because as you said,

Nothing is 100% efficient [or certain or guaranteed]

So should we not strive to make things as predictable as possible?

Everyone deserves empathy. All sentient beings, including this hypothetical man.

Again, all people deserve empathy

And yet, your ideal scenarios, you keep favouring one person/group at the expense of another. I don’t know if empathy is the word you actually mean to use. You can empathize with everyone while still favouring specific people, but your examples suggest that you’re using “empathy” to mean the actions you take (or don’t take) to help someone rather than the emotional state. In that case, it’s is indeed a binary either/or. In your examples, what you do to help one person will negatively affect others.

Dress for the job you want, not the job you have.