Logi

But they could publish another hash.

The NaXi Party for that Chinese dictator angle.

It kind of sounds like it might have been written to protect a mother wanting to have a child and then got misapplied.

My brain auto completed that as being up for auction.

No it did not. But it may have wronged it.

Having data is great. You can see what is… or was recently. But you need to feed this data into computer models to forecast the future, or a probability distribution about the future. And that’s what NOAA has and the navy doesn’t.

Some believe that their journey ultimately takes them to a place much, much lower.

I don’t know that What guy, but the other three lost. Stein repeatedly (if we pretend she was trying to win and not leech votes from Democrats). You are providing evidence against your case.

He can’t run for president since he wasn’t born American.

Would that be a problem when travelling to the… oh, right, we’re not doing that anymore… would this be a problem for Europeans travelling to Canada?

So… they chose to make a very Pixel-specific OS and you’re mad at Fairphone?

What gives you the idea that I have any such idea? I find that quite puzzling.

A nuclear detonation is a very delicate and precisely controlled process. It doesn’t just happen because a bomb goes off near the nuke. So sure, they can say anything, but there will be obvious evidence.

Speaking of saying anything, I’m going to look for reliable confirmation that this even happened. I’m not taking Trump’s fucking tweet for it.

i only have to drive 3 hours

Americans are so weird 🤔

Perhaps Democrat leadership deserves something or other but the country and the world doesn’t deserve this.

Why’d you get one where it doesn’t? 🤔

I’m sat here in Italy wondering che cazzo you’re talking about until I reached the word “Americans”. Because of course you were talking about Americans.

I do not.

See my other response to your pre-edit comment.

How about this, this is a real easy one. What type of function is this:

There is a theorem that “all smooth functions are locally linear”. In other words, most “normal” functions are indistinguishable from a straight line on the graph if you zoom in far enough.

So that’s not just not an easy one, it is an impossible one.

Or you can just admit you dont have any data to quantify your assertion that AI advancement is exponential growth.

Ah, that’s a fair argument. LLMs growing exponentially is just an assertion being made and we’re supposed to believe that then the steep growth must be just around the corner.

But all over this post you’ve got heavily downvoted comments that sound like you are misunderstanding exponential functions rather than doubting that they’re the right model for this.

We might be on the steep part of an S function right now.