I would fix that bug but the complete rewrite that management has had me working on for the past two years will make it obsolete anyway.
coder
I would fix that bug but the complete rewrite that management has had me working on for the past two years will make it obsolete anyway.
Mom, put down the phone, I’m using the modem!
That’s when you break out valgrind because you certainly are using uninitialized memory.
I’m trying to remember the last time I actually had a core file. I think core dumps have been disabled by default on Linux since at least 2000.
I don’t use Ruby anymore, but I still use irb
everyday as a command line calculator.
Tradition is just dead people’s baggage. Doug Stanhope.
I’m not great with gdb but I think using the x cmd shows them.
Your result is correct, is just not displaying the leading zeros.
One of the people reverse engineering the M1 GPU for Asahi Linux is a catgirl vtuber: https://www.youtube.com/asahilina
The problem is that if you send a message just blindly, you can be tricked into sending spam to millions of addresses. I do one thing that prevents that, but does violate the standard, I verify there’s only 1 ‘@’ in the address… this technically prevents people with '@'s in their name, but they probably find it impossible to do anything with that address anyway.
My problem with C/C++ is the people behind the spec have sacrificed our sanity in the name of “compiler optimization”. Signed overflow behaves the same on every cpu on the planet, why is it undefined behaviour? Even more insane, they specify intN_t
must be implemented via 2s complement… but signed overflow is still undefined because compilers want to pretend they run on pixie dust instead of real hardware.
And yet it’s still easy to write spaghetti code in Java. Just abuse inheritance. Where is this function implemented? No one knows but the compiler!