Talk to the manager Karen! Do it!
A software engineer that loves Disroot and the team behind it.
- 0 Posts
- 20 Comments
Joined 11 months ago
Cake day: December 22nd, 2023
You are not logged in. If you use a Fediverse account that is able to follow users, you can follow this user.
One person downvoted? Are they stupid or something? Asking for a friend.
Obviously, that’s what the “arms race” refers to. Birds used to have very strong arms which they used while racing in their super-fast arm bikes.
If you enjoyed it, I’ve collected a couple of others:
Reminds me this great story from a different era:
On a serious note, I really enjoy yerba mate-based (or should I write flavoured) elixirs. Or even yerba mate itself. Just saying! 🤷
That’s like… Your opinion, sis…
Do you eat them too? Asking for a friend!
Could someone explain how they’re going to drive 407 km/h in traffic jam? Or in a city, in general?
1·2 months agoI definitely agree that too many comments is often a bad sign, esp. when large part of them is obviously generated.
As mentioned in my other comment, names will rarely explain the reasons why a given solution was chosen. These reasons are important from maintenance perspective and should be recorded next to the relevant code.
You’re definitely not the only one.
In my opinion the important information we should record in comments is WHY, because the code can only explain HOW, maybe WHEN, but never WHY. If we don’t know WHY, any refactoring done in the future could break the logic by ignoring assumptions made by the authors.
What’s the font used in the heading? Is it some flavour of Helvetica?
I keep telling myself that in the ideal world, phones would be programmed in Forth.
That comment… Oh my, I want to joke and talk someone like you! Now!
I tried searching for research on it, but only found results claiming this didn’t work… Not actual scientific research, but better than “we think this should work, so now we’ll try selling it”
I often skip meetings without agenda. If they don’t care to prepare a reasonable invitation, I don’t care to join. Also - I skip meetings where they announce stuff. Announcements should go to my inbox, so I can read them when ready, not when they think it’s suitable for them.
My main concern with people making fun of such cases is about deficiencies of “AI” being harder to find/detect but obviously present.
Whenever someone publishes a proof of a system’s limitations, the company behind it gets a test case to use to improve it. The next time we - the reasonable people arguing that cybernetic hallucinations aren’t AI yet and are dangerous - try using such point, we would only get a reply of “oh yeah, but they’ve fixed it”. Even people in IT often don’t understand what they’re dealing with, so the non-IT people may have even more difficulties…
Myself - I just boycott this rubbish. I’ve never tried any LLM and don’t plan to, unless it’s used to work with language, not knowledge.
That’s what she said!