Pup Biru

You can do all that with a CSS variable though…

and then people have to learn what it all means, where those variables are, how your mess of custom CSS hangs together, and probably what overrides what in your hierarchy

you end up with this soup of classes on every single element

it’s either than or a soup of stuff in CSS. the difference is largely academic in modern HTML because it’s all contained in components anyway

they have to be as short as possible, and so they can’t use font-size and font-weight.

they don’t have to be; they could easily use font size and font weight, but i much much prefer the -lg notation… it makes your flow so much quicker. it reduces cognitive load significantly

I still suspect you’re better off just using the effort you would need to learn the tailwind classes to instead learn plain flexbox.

i know flexbox and grid plenty well, and similar applies across the board for things like tailwind: containing everything together so that you don’t have to mess around switching between different places to define things, and using classes that kinda just represent what you want in shorthand literally makes my frontend development literally 10x quicker, and just feel smoother… even when i’m just doing personal projects

you don’t have to believe me; that’s fine… but i used to think similarly to you, had a couple of failed attempts and hated tailwind, and my most recent personal projects it just clicked and everything feels so nice. i’m a principal engineer, and have done plenty of work on all kinds of projects so it’s not like i’m inexperienced and just go with the latest fad. these small time savings really add up

i’m not a frontend engineer so don’t know the difference between text- and font- without looking but that’s another good example of why frameworks are great: 6px is an explicit size, where md, 2xl, etc are all relative… per project you can decide what those sizes are and everything just falls into place… you rarely really care what the size is in pixels; mostly you only care about sizes relative to other parts of the UI… so again, people joining on a project don’t need to memorise magic numbers, because they just know without needing to guess what the size suffixes are

i’ve only recently started to use tailwind (originally i saw no point, pretty much for the reasons you’re stating: why use classes like that when you can just use styles on the element and we know that’s bad) but since i embraced it i’ve started writing quality components much much faster… especially for layout like flexbox and grid it just flows really nicely, and i really don’t find that it feels like i’m repeating myself at all (partly because “repeating yourself” should be avoided by simply using components these days: CSS is an over-complicated and ill-fitting solution to the problem of styling in modern UIs)

(okay i looked up text- and font-: text is size, font is weight… which tracks with my understanding of the other parts of tailwind and the way type is handled in software generally… i think there are no good options here)

the same could be said for languages that aren’t binary: what does it save you! you still have to write stuff to get the program you want, and you still have to come up with the business rules

almost all software engineering tools just save you keystrokes, or save you from needing the knowledge to implement repeatable things… or for having a standardised way of doing things so new people can approach your project without having to learn as many details (eg rails, django, nextjs, etc: the terminology and layout of such projects are familiar; daos/views/etc all behave the same)

for css frameworks for example, perhaps you have a .rounded-corners class… sure you could just implement it yourself, but if you’re using a framework you save a few minutes, the outcome is likely the same, you don’t need to know about the border radius details (and likely css frameworks implement things like shims or accessibility correctly; freeing you from needing to have deep knowledge of some esoteric details), and if the framework is big (like tailwind etc) then if you employ someone new, they know exactly what .rounded-corners means

… obviously .rounded-corners is a pretty simple example, but you can imagine when these libraries fill out with many many tools the shorthand’s get much more complex

they might, but the point is the volume of data rather than the speed… CERN is obviously an outlier, but not by as much as you’d think. copious amounts of data is kinda par for the course in a lot of cases, and training data just doesn’t even come close to the volume of data that large data users produce (data warehouses/lakes in the order of PB and EB are not that uncommon)

honestly servers don’t need the latest hardware: just build using DDR4 (or even DDR3): it’s half the price per GB or less each step down, and honestly the biggest reason you want RAM in a server is for a ZFS cache, which is going to be bottlenecked on plenty of other things far before your RAM speed (IMO; i’ve done exactly 0 testing)

(though the max size of a DDR3 module is 8GB so on most consumer hardware that will limit you to 32GB total)

relative to the hard drive market in general, that seems like a drop in the bucket. research labs like CERN write TBs per SECOND

quality data sets don’t even come close

what kind of monster writes a script without a shebang?

right? a US friend of mine messaged me the other day “is VIC on fire?”… like… na, and actually this summer has been pretty mild so far lol. i haven’t even seen a single melting road!

it says self cleaning though

i’m guessing more like these

they’re all over in australia and generally pretty good. i wouldn’t call them clean, but for requiring very little maintenance they’re fricken spotless

hell even just add NATO, EU, Canada, Mexico, and Panama to the list… prevent a problem for once

absolutely! similar is true of node in v8 (though python imo is far more mature in this regard) and probably most other languages

exactly why things like numpy are so popular: yeah python is slow, but python is just the orchestrator

further to that, “demonstrably worse for the planet” i’d like to debate: considering a huge amount of climate science is done with python-based tools because they’re far easier for researchers to pick up and run with - ie just get shit done rather than write good/clean code - i’d argue the benefit of python to the planet is in the outputs it enables for significantly reduced (or in many cases, perhaps outright enabled) input costs

yeah we have a “supply charge” that’s ~$1/day on top of that base rate too, so roughly the same situation :(

we’ve got this crap because of privatisation so it’s not likely to change any time soon.

i hope your energy prices come down when energy things stabilise in europe!

just sayin’ this is still so incredibly cheap… 8c/kwh… australian electricity prices are 24-43c/kwh (obv usd vs aud but the aussie $ isn’t that weak)

redacting information is a lot harder than that. you often have to redact things that allow people to draw correlations that lead to identity… details like that should be redacted

but this is ridiculous on its own, even without the enormous blunders that prove it’s about protecting co-conspirators rather than victims

enron sold plenty of gas and real things too: it’s the double handling that’s the problem; not the nature of the goods or services

openai has practically no value and that’s well known… nvidia is paying companies to buy their chips and playing bullshit shell games

the difference is openai is a pretty well known unprofitable company, and they aren’t doing quite as much of the bullshit shell games. nvidia is selling to basically everyone, taking stakes in companies, giving weird deals… it’s bloody impossible to track how much of their sales are real and how much those real sales are actually worth, or if those sales are loss leaders for some investment then those investments look a lot like openai

so nvidia not only is invested in a lot of very questionable AI bubble companies, but also their own sales figures are… unreliable

they’re making billions upon billions because they’re using their own money multiple times. it’s kinda like leveraged trading with all the risk and it’s incredible arrogant at the scale that nvidia is doing it

fevers break if your immune system attacks and destroys the threat. if the infection wins, you die. if you’re immunocompromised and get a fever, it’s very very bad news

i’m not saying that the democrats are compromised and they’re the immune system in this analogy of course… no no no… im just commenting on the biology!

before i start i want to make sure that this should in no way be interpreted as a “both sides” argument: i think yall should choose the most likely to win, least bad candidate (ie defensive voting; as disgusting as it is) - which almost certainly means a democrat at this point

i think it’s important to remember that both republican and democrats are relatively symmetrical in a lot of regards (not all). there are likely a similar number of people who actively support the democrats (distinct from defensive voting) no matter what, and they’d likely be equally problematic fixing systemic issues

perhaps they’d be easier to persuade, but it’s really easy to think that people on “our side” are governed by logic alone, but study after study has said that both sides are susceptible to propaganda and other political tools to a similar degree

chinas stance towards the south china sea and taiwan is what this exaggeration for the purposes of comedy is based on