When did they say “fuck morality policing”, or even “let’s all stop policing morality”?

Either you piggy-backed off a comment to be a whole weirdo. Or you neee to up your reading comprehension.

Hanging brain is specifically an act, but generally, the scrotum is “supposed” to look like a brain.

These are tears of…unrelated crying.

I’m not in this post and it definitely doesn’t hurt.

Inconceivable.

“Democrats unleash their new administrative strategem named the Fifth Reich.”

How’d you know it was a half-hour later?

That’s why I never piss and shit. Whobknows how many layers deep I am at any given moment??

You’ve just catapulted into the territory of square-root of negative 1 dates.

Keep this up and we’ll upgrade you to having 0 dates.

A “Ministry of Truth” only works when a force controls all the information and, if global sources of information are controlled the discussion feels moot (from a “putting checks to the government” standpoint).

And absolutely. Corporations legally being people and being “entitled” to “free speech using money” has to be obliterated. It’s farcical on its face and enables billionaires to multi-dip on stealing from the populace by siphon away their money and then using those immorally-obtained funds to have an outsized representation as the discretionary force of corporations.

You know how corporations can have a voice? By the people who work in that corporation voting like they already are able to do. That’s it.

Huh. You were right: you do fall to doomerism quickly.

I cannot be arsed to disassemble someone else’s “shit’s fucked” mentality this early in the morning, and I refuse to have unearned, foreign ennui stinking up my headspace.

What I said wasn’t for Democrat talking points in the next debates. They were things to hammer into the new laws if the government is ever reforged.

No, if you say inflammatory shit that leads to deaths then it doesn’t matter if you didn’t mean to. Politicians should be afraid to speak if their words can kill and disenfranchise.

We don’t have to fall into pits of objective truth. If you say something, be perfectly explicit about what is a factual statement and what is your opinion. If you’re making a factual statement, have a source and make sure the source is credible. Or face penalties when your bunk is debunked.

Science has already tread the path of “attempting to find truth through the consensus of doubts”. No need to try and trailblaze.

There needs to be legal and political repercussions for politicians lying or misrepresenting the truth. Doesn’t matter if they didn’t mean to, then they should’ve done better research.

I imagine things would be better if all that fillibuster time was converted into them carefully choosing what to say.

…why is this a shitpost?

I don’t like the presumption of video sales for CSAM.

Edit: not a dig at you, but of the unpleasant viability of that statement.

I don’t think that young but I wouldn’t put anything past anymore.

I choose to believe these are rage-bait and false flags. Otherwise, multiple someones managed to learn a language with so little introspection and contextual understanding that I’d have to downgrade them to an LLM.

Let a man live his passion. American Girl dolls have busted footwear and he’s filling a need we all have

This is what happens when you don’t make words mean things. Evil people erode language until white is black is green and the empathetic are evil. And you’re mired in an mud wrestling match with disingenuity, while evil’s cronies shoot the audience.

I refuse to amplify that. Sounds like Cyberpunk “gonk and choomba” nonsense.

I’ll call them “comm(s)” as Izanagi intended.