I don’t have a view on this particular case, but “calling it out” whilst still functioning effectively as normal is essentially a strongly-worded letter. F, and I can’t stress this enough, that. Protest cannot be subdued by convenience.
I feel we disagree on a number of fundamental things. We’re not going to get anywhere on a site like this
You mention lots of options. Given people are varied, and you want that in a company, how about letting the candidate decide how to prove themselves? It’s pretty established that it’s not “fair” to stick to a single style, so why hang on to that?
I meant judging people for feeling anxious, as opposed to judging aptitude.
for those who this affects, this lands badly
deleted by creator
Stress is not something you can reason about in the way you imply. It’s an emotional response, and people vary wildly in how they will react. It’s great to hear you don’t get stressed, but judging people who do is, well, concerning.
Live coding in interviews is a completely different experience to pair programming, night and day. I don’t ever recall being asked to code in front of a group.
The article isn’t saying don’t check, it’s saying that live coding interviews are a bad measure.
You seem to be disagreeing with something that isn’t the main point of the article.
That you take those steps doesn’t mean candidates aren’t stressed, despite your intentions.
I’m not sure I can think of an example beyond lack of software/driver support
General difficulty of use (i.e. how many things do I have to read and do for something to happen the way I want)
And I want libraries to be officially supported, whatever that looks like, mainly so I don’t have to use workarounds or unverified sources (I don’t want to be using lots of Arch’s equivalent of PPAs, for example)
my distro has Polish, but translated into English cos I can’t read Polish. Very user-friendly
I’m not trusting a regex written by AI
I don’t understand your point. How is it good that the developers thought they were faster? Does that imply anything at all in LLMs’ favour? IMO that makes the situation worse because we’re not only fighting inefficiency, but delusion.
20% slower is substantial. Imagine the effect on the economy if 20% of all output was discarded (or more accurately, spent using electricity).
I honestly don’t believe it’s snarky. I think a lot of us have had enough of this corporate AI hype bullshit
How reliable is this study? Is it peer-reviewed?
how do you know this stuff?!
hmmm, perhaps 2x32GB is overkill …
i’m getting a 6000/28CL
I’m thinking 2x32GB, tempted by more but seems excessive
I’m going NVME
The title points out the problem. It DOESN’T MATTER what he intended; we already know his views. What matters is the message it sent to far-right supporters across the globe. He never made an attempt to address that.