Yeah, I’m liking it so far, but I’m still very much in the testing phase, I don’t have any “real” data in it yet.

“find your dream job”

Which is what I did: working in tech. Ever since I was a kid, I wanted to build things, but I also wanted to support a family. At first I wanted to be a carpenter, but the likelihood of making good money with that was small, so I learned to build websites and decided to make a career out of it (I actually thought about patent law, but realized SW patents don’t build, but prevent things from being built).

So yeah, I’m basically doing exactly what I want, and I’ve avoided working for companies I hate.

That said, I’ve been doing the same thing for many years now, so a change of pace would be welcome, but I still want to build things. Unfortunately, LLMs are trying to take the part of like (actually building things) and is trying to replace it with designing things. I guess I could pivot to that, but seeing something built doesn’t have the same satisfaction for me.

If I had enough to retire, I’d probably start an indie game studio, and I’d hire a lead designer and work on the fun algorithms myself. So my main complaint is what I work on, so I could probably be happier with a different company, but there’s no perfect company and I like my current team, so I’m not particularly interested in leaving.

And for Microsoft, to get a back catalogue to ensure your subscription service remains attractive.

Really? I haven’t tried that since they revamped the sharing thing. I have three accounts, one for me, my wife, and one my kids share, and they’re all linked. Most of the time my kids use my account, but I can easily change that if it’ll allow simultaneous play (on different games).

Thanks for the tip, I’ll try it out!

Cool, the app that doesn’t exist on my phone will access an account I don’t have. I’ve never used WhatsApp and I don’t plan to start now.

Yeah, and it’s presumptious of them to access the WhatsApp account I don’t have…

Right, and it depends on what “quite off target” means. Are we talking about greens becoming purples? Or dark greens becoming bright greens? If the image is still mostly recognizable, just with poor saturation or contrast or whatever, I think it’s acceptable for older software.

it would work

And that’s probably enough. I don’t know enough about HDR to know if it would look anything like the artist imagined, but as long as it’s close enough, it’s fine if it’s not optimal. Having things completely break is far less than ideal.

Exactly. I have something like 10-20 “complete” games because they either give 100% completion for rolling credits or I really enjoyed the game and ended up completing the achievements anyway. Of the rest, I’ve probably rolled credits on 80% of my “played” games, because sometimes I just lose interest before I reach the end, while still enjoying my time w/ it.

Games should be fun, and if they stop being fun, move on.

No, the Steam life is not to play games, but to buy them.

A lot of Steam games don’t have any DRM, and most of the rest are pretty easy to strip.

Give it a shot sometime. Completely quit out of Steam, turn off your internet, and try running some of your older Steam games directly from the Steam folder.

I do this somewhat often when my kids are on my other computer playing games on my account and I still want to play something. It’s a little trickier on Linux since you need something to run the Proton/WINE layer, so I mostly stick to Linux-native games in that pretty rare case.

Yeah, I have far fewer games and have played a lower percent of the ones I have. There are just so many bundles that have one or two games I do want and I just add the rest to my library.

Exactly!

And it’s highly unlikely that OP is playing 100% new-releases, especially w/ that 200+ installed games, so they’re probably getting a bunch of those well below store price (i.e. through bundles and whatnot). I have several hundred games, many of which I haven’t played, and most of those came in a bundle that included a couple games I did play (and the total price was significantly less than the retail price of the games I did play).

I’m guessing that’s OP’s case, and given how many they claim to have played, I’m guessing they have a lot of time to play games.

not finishing so many of your games shows some kind of problem

If they’ve played 23%, that’s a lot of games, as in, well over 1k. Thy said nothing about how many they’ve finished, but I don’t think “finishing” is all that important.

What I’m more interested in is how much time they have for playing games. What’s they’re lifestyle like that they can play nearly 2k games while also accomplishing other life goals? It’s not an unreasonable amount, just sufficiently high that it raises some eyebrows.

I feel like it’s an obligation for me to finish a game unless I don’t like it.

If OP isn’t finishing any games, yeah, I agree. But there are a ton of games that I don’t find worth finishing, in any sense you define that, but that I still find worth playing.

For example, I didn’t finish Brutal Legend because I really didn’t like the RTS bits at the end. I still love that game and recommend it, but I only recommend it w/ the caveat that the ending is quite different from the rest of the game and it’s okay to bail. That type of game isn’t going to have an amazing ending, so the risk of not seeing the ending is pretty small (and I can always look that up on YT or elsewhere if I want). I did the same for Clustertruck because the ending had an insane difficulty spike on the last level and I just didn’t care enough to finish it.

However, other times I have pushed through, such as Ys 1 Chronicles, which has an insane difficulty spike on the final boss. I am happy I pushed through, because I really liked the world and the ending, which feeds into the next game (in fact, on Steam, it automatically started Ys II after finishing Ys 1). I ended up not liking Ys II as much (still finished), but I really liked the tie-over from the first to the second.

So yeah, I don’t fault someone for not finishing games, but I do think they’re missing out if they never finish games.

Isn’t that what 802.1x is for? If you really want to lock down your network, there are options.

A certain amount of skepticism is healthy, but it’s also quite common for people to go overboard and completely avoid a useful thing just because some rich idiot is pushing it. I’ve seen a lot of misinformation here on Lemmy about LLMs because people hate the environment its in (layoffs in the name of replacing people with “AI”), but they completely ignore the merit the tech has (great at summarizing and providing decent results from vague queries). If used properly, LLMs can be quite useful, but people hyper-focus on the negatives, probably because they hate the marketing material and the exceptional cases the news is great at shining a spotlight on.

I also am skeptical about LLMs usefulness, but I also find them useful in some narrow use-cases I have at work. It’s not going to actually replace any of my coworkers anytime soon, but it does help me be a bit more productive since it’s yet another option to get me unstuck when I hit a wall.

Just because there’s something bad about something doesn’t make the tech useless. If something gets a ton of funding, there’s probably some merit to it, so turn your skepticism into a healthy quest for truth and maybe you’ll figure out how to benefit from it.

For example, the hype around cryptocurrency makes it easy to knee-jerk reject the technology outright, because it looks like it’s merely a tool to scam people out of their money. That is partially true, but it’s also a tool to make anonymous transactions feasible. Yes, there are scammers out there pushing worthless coins in a pump and dump scheme, but there are also privacy-focused coins (Monero, Z-Cash, etc) that are being used today to help fund activists operating under repressive regimes. It’s also used by people doing illegal things, but hey, so is cash, and privacy coins are basically easier to use cash. We probably wouldn’t have had those w/o Bitcoin, though they use very different technology under the hood to achieve their aims. Maybe they’re not for you, but they do help people.

Instead of focusing on the bad of a new technology, more people should focus on the good, and then weigh for themselves whether the good is worth the bad. I think in many cases it is, but only if people are sufficiently informed about how to use them to their advantage.

Can’t search for something on the net anymore without being served f-tier LLM-produced garbage.

I don’t see a material difference vs the f-tier human-produced garbage we had before. Garbage content will always exist, which is why it’s important to learn to how to filter it.

This is true of LLMs as well: they can and do produce garbage, but they can and are useful alternatives to existing tech. I don’t use them exclusively, but as an alternative when traditional search or whatever isn’t working, they’re quite useful. They provide rough summaries about things that I can usually easily verify, and they produce a bunch of key words that can help refine my future searches. I use them a handful of times each week and spend more time using traditional search and reading full articles, but I do find LLMs to be a useful tool in my toolbox.

I also am frustrated by energy use, but it’s one of those things that will get better over time as the LLM market matures from a gold rush into established businesses that need to actually make money. The same happens w/ pretty much every new thing in tech, there’s a ton of waste until the product finds its legs and then becomes a lot more efficient.

VR is still cool and will probably always be cool, but I doubt it’ll never be mainstream. 3D was just awkward, and they really just wanted VR but the tech wasn’t there yet.

I own neither, yet I’ve been considering VR for a few years now, just waiting for more headsets to have proper Linux support before I get one.

Likewise, I’m not paying for LLMs, but I do use the ones my workplace provides. They’re useful sometimes, and it’s nice to have them as an option when I hit a wall or something. I think they’re interesting and useful, but not nearly as powerful as the big corporations want you to think.

There’s a difference between healthy skepticism and invalid, knee-jerk opposition.

LLMs are a useful tool sometimes, and I use them for refining general ideas into specific things to research, and they’re pretty good at that. Sure, what they output isn’t trustworthy on its own, but I can pretty easily verify most of what it spits out, and it does a great job of spitting out a lot of stuff that’s related to what I asked.

For example, I’m a SW dev, so I’ll often ask it stuff like, “compare and contrast popular projects that do X”, and it’ll find a few for me and give easily-verifiable details about each one. Sometimes it’s wrong on one or two details, but it gives me enough to decide which ones I want to look more deeply into. Or I’ll do some greenfield research into a topic I’m not familiar with, and it does a fantastic job of pulling out keywords and other domain-specific stuff that help refine what I search for.

LLMs do a lot less than their proponents claim, but they also do a lot more than detractors claim. They’re a useful tool if you understand the limitations and have a rough idea of how they work. They’re a terrible tool if you buy into the BS coming from the large corps pushing them. I will absolutely push back against people on both extremes.

That depends. Something like HDR should be able to fall back to non-HDR since it largely just adds data, so if the format specifies that extra information is ignored, there’s a chance it works fine.