Compadre? Compadre is not uncommon here in the States, especially in the South, due to the dialectical intermingling of Spanish. Though it is similar, it has different connotations than comrade, but, you know, I don’t read, so I can’t tell the difference.
Sorry you don’t like de lingua, buddy. I can adjust that, but your comments weren’t particularly helpful in that regard.
I think you’re taking what I said too literally. Fair, I said it’s not canceling out something, but that refers to an act, as you can imply from the second post, not a group of people, but I do see the confusion.
Personally, I don’t see people and actions as the same, so if you do, then that would be our miscommunication. Does that help, compadre? It’s sorta like a guy stopping fire fighters and another guy stopping that guy and you’re over here going “Wow, can’t believe these two guys are both stopping people.” Does that make sense to someone that acts like a three year old but definitely isn’t?
… You didn’t listen. Democrats don’t say that. They say that it cancels out what Republicans are doing. Not that it cancels out Republicans.
So, yes, it does suck to suck. You either don’t know what you’re talking about, or you are lying. It’s that simple, buddy.
Because I don’t think that Republicans say it cancels out anything. Unless you’re saying that they say it cancels out California when it happened afterward, which is obviously false.
Personally, your lack of specificity is your problem, so… Eh, sucks to suck.
Woah man, you can’t just say that politicians rape women without consequences.
They also rape children, too.
Skilled people are not born that way. You can be predisposed towards certain skills, and you can even argue that only some people can be the best at something, but all those can do is decrease the amount of time it takes to become skilled. No matter what, you can learn to do something. You can learn to draw. You can learn to write. You can learn to tell stories. You can learn to be creative. You can become skilled at most things. You may not be able to be the best, but practice will always get you closer to best than predisposition. You are literally not just born with it.
That is a very selective list. You can argue that they’re neoliberals with this, and that’s true, but you can’t argue they’re the same as GWB, lmao, the dumbest president we had had at the point. Anyone who tells you they were the same as Dubya has memory issues or is lying.
You let me know where they defunded the schools or got us into trillion dollar wars, just unbelievable that people think they’re the same and forget ol’ fucking Dubya and his mission accomplished, “God told me” bullshit.
Smart people don’t know everything. Smart people change their mind when confronted with things they are wrong about or don’t know enough about.
I can tell you still haven’t finished your homework.
You haven’t given those solutions, you haven’t pushed for changes on the solutions given here.
Not a solution. Not a change to a proposed solution.
Do you understand yet why I find you to be a bystander?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hyperreal_number
Infinite numbers are numbers. Infinity is not a real number, but it is a hyperreal number, and thus a number.
Misleading, at best, factually incorrect at worst.
Infinity is a number, unless your problem is that the indefinite article was there, but it is a number.
Yes, but… Why aren’t they implemented? You can argue that the Dems fight you, but you’re wasting energy here fighting people that aren’t Dems. You haven’t given those solutions, you haven’t pushed for changes on the solutions given here. What’s the point?
You can make broad generalizations like that, and, generally, there is some truth to it. But that doesn’t defend YOUR actions. YOU are doing nothing to fix this. That is the point.
I get that other people are also not doing enough, that’s a legitimate criticism, but it is not a defense, and it is a deflection when people point out your actions and you point that out.
If you think no evil is better than less evil, I agree with that. But where is your no evil? You cannot make effective change by watching people die because your principles wouldn’t let you choose anything other than no evil, because… That isn’t a no evil choice?
I’m sorry you feel that way. You are still a sanctimonious bystander. You can pretend you did the right thing while you watch people die and feel superior about it. It is certainly a way to sleep at night.
Cool, you didn’t listen. You are the average ML. You should feel proud to add this to your list of accomplishments.
That is so fucking stupid.
A lesser evil can also lead to less evil incrementally as progress is made. What you’re arguing for is to say that people should take a lesser evil and then take EVEN LESS evil than that. Your insistence on perfection will kill people.
I get that you want to be sanctimonious, but saving one person now is better than saving two people tomorrow, because it has the potential to also save two people tomorrow.
Watch as I use your same logic against you: Your no evil strategy resulted in Trump, and those Palestinians are grateful that you exterminated them faster. Nice going!
See how stupid that is?
Damn, and then the “ackshually I didnt SAY I was american” bullshit. The oldies are still here, folks.
We can all read, why are you even pretending?
Hold on, I gotta set you up for the next one “classic intolerant left, being mean to someone who’s just asking questions!”. Uhh, how about, “you’re such a pathetic little weasel.” That work for you, or do I have to really dig into how much of an actual loser you are? I mean, I can, but it’s so unnecessary because of how obvious it is that I’m not sure if I’m repeating myself.
Highly recommend it. Sounds cool. Sounds like kum-pah-dray. Roll the R. Means companion or friend. Let’s you say howdy and y’all for free.