misk@sopuli.xyz to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 9 days agoRussia takes unusual route to hack Starlink-connected devices in Ukrainearstechnica.comexternal-linkmessage-square36fedilinkarrow-up1186arrow-down13cross-posted to: technology@beehaw.orgcybersecurity@sh.itjust.works
arrow-up1183arrow-down1external-linkRussia takes unusual route to hack Starlink-connected devices in Ukrainearstechnica.commisk@sopuli.xyz to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 9 days agomessage-square36fedilinkcross-posted to: technology@beehaw.orgcybersecurity@sh.itjust.works
minus-squareImplyingImplications@lemmy.calinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up47arrow-down1·9 days agoHe has refused to allow Ukrainian troops to use Starlink within Russian occupied regions to avoid “conflict escalation”.
minus-squareFree_Opinions@feddit.uklinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up8arrow-down42·9 days agoIt would be illegal to enable it within Russian/occupied territory because of US sanctions.
minus-squareCM400@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up34arrow-down2·9 days agoHe also doesn’t let Ukraine use starlink in Russian-occupied regions of Ukraine, according to a quick google search.
minus-squareFree_Opinions@feddit.uklinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6arrow-down13·9 days agoIt’s prohibited by U.S. sanctions to Russia.
minus-squarelepinkainen@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up14arrow-down3·9 days agoSo if a single Russian soldier enters the US, all of America must stop everything because of sanctions against Russsia?
minus-squareFree_Opinions@feddit.uklinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4arrow-down4·8 days ago…what? No, U.S.A is not under U.S.A. sanctions. Crimea and the rest of the occupied territories are.
minus-squareLifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up11arrow-down1·8 days agoRussia doesn’t own the land they put troops on? What are you talking about.
minus-squareFree_Opinions@feddit.uklinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4arrow-down3·8 days agoI’m not the one setting the sanctions. If you have complaints you can tell it to the U.S. government.
minus-squarePasserby6497@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4arrow-down1·9 days agoWhy? Can starlink not track which ones they give to Ukraine and not let any others work in the area? Or would that require competence that Leon Skum and company doesn’t have?
minus-squareFree_Opinions@feddit.uklinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up7arrow-down5·9 days agoYou’re asking the wrong person. I don’t work for U.S. goverment - I don’t know why the sanctions are what they are.
He has refused to allow Ukrainian troops to use Starlink within Russian occupied regions to avoid “conflict escalation”.
It would be illegal to enable it within Russian/occupied territory because of US sanctions.
He also doesn’t let Ukraine use starlink in Russian-occupied regions of Ukraine, according to a quick google search.
It’s prohibited by U.S. sanctions to Russia.
So if a single Russian soldier enters the US, all of America must stop everything because of sanctions against Russsia?
…what? No, U.S.A is not under U.S.A. sanctions. Crimea and the rest of the occupied territories are.
Russia doesn’t own the land they put troops on? What are you talking about.
I’m not the one setting the sanctions. If you have complaints you can tell it to the U.S. government.
Why? Can starlink not track which ones they give to Ukraine and not let any others work in the area? Or would that require competence that Leon Skum and company doesn’t have?
You’re asking the wrong person. I don’t work for U.S. goverment - I don’t know why the sanctions are what they are.