• Deconceptualist@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    18 hours ago

    Wow. There’s no way this was actually greenlit by an ethics committee unless they’re all corrupt. This is so blatantly wrong and manipulative.

    • NeonNight@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      9 hours ago

      It was reviewed by an ethics board, but they changed the parameters of their study (shifting more towards using personal info against commenters/making up personal info to use in arguments) without it being approved by the ethics board. Essentially their study wasn’t going anywhere so they made it more unethical in order to have more data to work with. They’re on Reddit trying to defend themselves but no one is having it

      • teawrecks@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        6 hours ago

        Just so you know, this is called Moral Nihilism, and it seems to me about as useful as a physicist saying, “none of our models are 100% accurate, therefore they are all completely useless”.

        Like, yeah we agree that ethics is a construct we’ve invented, and no ethical system is perfect, and none of them ever will be. But that doesn’t translate to them all being useless. I know we’re living in a stressful time, and I understand the feeling of wanting to just flip the table and give up, but please recognize that as a purely emotional response, not a rational one.