• Admiral Patrick@dubvee.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    14 hours ago

    Just not a fan of container formats in general.

    I say that as a heavy user of Docker, but that’s a different use-case.

      • Admiral Patrick@dubvee.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        14 hours ago

        At least for appimage, it doesn’t create application launchers. And it’s 50/50 whether the icon in the window list works or not.

        I also build a lot of Docker images, and container formats throw a wrench in that if that’s the only way the application/utility is packaged. So I end up building from source.

        • klu9@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          13 hours ago

          Personally, I use AM. Takes care of that and more.

          It is CLI and I’m GUI by nature, but AM is easy enough for me. Just yesterday I did a simple am -u and got the latest updated versions of qBittorrent, FreeTube, yt-dlp etc. (I.e. the kind of program that system packages are too out of date to work safely or even work at all.)

          There are other options like zap (CLI), Gear Lever (GUI) and just recently I believe the Nitrux distro came out with a complete AppImage software manager. (Checking it out, https://github.com/Nitrux/nx-software-center , it seems it pulls from AppImageHub.com, which unfortunately has largely been forgotten by developers, a lot of software is either out of date, unverifiable or completely absent. AM is much more up-to-date, pulling the latest AppImages mostly from official GitHub repos.)