• Archer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      edit-2
      16 hours ago

      Federal military enforcing federal immigration policies is not martial law.

      A military performing law enforcement isn’t martial law? Please enlighten me as to how that is lol

      • FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        11
        ·
        edit-2
        16 hours ago

        Have the military replaced the government now?

        Do you know what the F in FBI stands for by any chance?

        • Furbag@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          6 hours ago

          Have the military replaced the government now?

          That would be a military junta, not martial law.

          Martial law is when soldiers, not peace officers, are tasked with upholding law and order.

          It doesn’t matter if it’s for a good reason or not, it’s still martial law.

        • stickly@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          8 hours ago

          The F sure as fuck doesn’t stand for Army you fucking ape.

          The FBI has the authority to enforce laws passed through regular congressional channels by elected officials.

          Here the commander in chief is declaring a policy and enforcing it directly with his own power. It’s the textbook definition.