With the implementation of Patch v0.5.5 this week, we must make yet another compromise. From this patch onward, gliding will be performed using a glider rather than with Pals. Pals in the player’s team will still provide passive buffs to gliding, but players will now need to have a glider in their inventory in order to glide.

How lame. Japan needs to fix its patent laws, it’s ridiculous Nintendo owns the simple concept of using an animal to fly.

  • Arkouda@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    60
    ·
    1 day ago

    We are talking about gliding on a mount…a very common game feature…

    "On November 30th, 2024, we released Patch v0.3.11 for Palworld,” it said. “This patch removed the ability to summon Pals by throwing Pal Spheres and instead changed it to a static summon next to the player.

    Well I am talking about the blatant plagiarism, which is what the devs for Palworld did.

    • BombOmOm@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      29
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      Summoning creatures from an object is hardly “blatant plagiarism”. Many, many, many games have the ability to summon creatures from an object. Pokemon was certainly not the first one to do it…

      • Arkouda@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        43
        ·
        1 day ago

        Summoning creatures from an object is hardly “blatant plagiarism”. Many, many, many games have the ability to summon creatures from an object. Pokemon was certainly not the first one to do it…

        What will you argue if I bring up the fact that they ripped off countless Pokemon?

        Oh wait.

        I don’t care because I am not here to argue with someone who doesn’t understand what plagiarism is. Luckily the courts do, and ruled on the case. :)

        • BombOmOm@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          31
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          What will you argue if I bring up the fact that they ripped off countless Pokemon?

          The case case isn’t about character designs, the case is about patents Nintendo filed after PocketPair released a game with said mechanics. The idea that one should be able to patent a game mechanic someone else has already released in their games is BS. Japan’s patent system sucks and Nintendo sucks for abusing it.

        • Tattorack@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          26
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 day ago

          The courts ruled it isn’t plagerism. So… You’re looking pretty stupid here.

          The patents in question have nothing to do with creature designs. And neither would patent law be covering the design of creatures. That would be copyright law.

          • Arkouda@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            30
            ·
            1 day ago

            Weird how they are overhauling their game if the courts ruled in favour of them eh?

            • pivot_root@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              21
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              1 day ago

              Buddy, quit while you’re ahead not too far behind. You’re just proving what @Tattorack@lemmy.world said: you don’t understand the difference between patents, copyright, and trademarks.

        • Caesium@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          13
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 day ago

          the difference here is that a ton of other creature collector games have done something similar when it comes to summoning them. Coromon is the first one thst pops up in my head.

          what makes palworld different? it genuinely sold well, enough to challenge Nintendo and it’s monopoly with their Pokémon games. Which they barely put any effort in nowadays because they sell regardless because of brand loyalty