ElCanut@jlai.lu to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 9 months agoPlease Stopjlai.luimagemessage-square423fedilinkarrow-up11.38Karrow-down186
arrow-up11.29Karrow-down1imagePlease Stopjlai.luElCanut@jlai.lu to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 9 months agomessage-square423fedilink
minus-squarekameecoding@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up36arrow-down10·9 months agoYeah it’s called a database…
minus-squarewise_pancake@lemmy.calinkfedilinkarrow-up9arrow-down5·9 months agoThere aren’t a lot of distributed databases with no single owner and all writes are signed.
minus-squarekameecoding@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up19arrow-down7·9 months agoYeah, but not having an owner is actually a fucking terrible thing for a banking system, how do you not grasp this?
minus-squareKnock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up4arrow-down5·9 months agoNo owner is great for a banking system. It stops the owner printing money whenever they feel like it.
minus-squarewise_pancake@lemmy.calinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down5·9 months agoI do grasp it. I don’t really know what situation it makes sense for. It seems like a tool for cases where nobody can agree who should own the records of something so now everyone should.
Yeah it’s called a database…
There aren’t a lot of distributed databases with no single owner and all writes are signed.
Yeah, but not having an owner is actually a fucking terrible thing for a banking system, how do you not grasp this?
No owner is great for a banking system. It stops the owner printing money whenever they feel like it.
Bruh
I do grasp it.
I don’t really know what situation it makes sense for. It seems like a tool for cases where nobody can agree who should own the records of something so now everyone should.