• Vathsade@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 months ago

      We need to accept a premium for the cleanest and safest baseload generation we have.

      • Diplomjodler@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        You can build a lot of batteries for 35 billion. And those don’t produce waste that you have to store for millennia.

        • xmunk@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          10 months ago

          Some modern nuclear reactor models produce less long-term waste than batteries.

          • partial_accumen@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            10 months ago

            Lmao and what about battery waste when they’re past their lifespan in 15 years?

            Well, if you mean Lithium batteries, you grind up the dead batteries and make new Lithium batteries from that. Its not like lithium is burned up never to be used again with these. Here’s the lithium and cobalt extracted from recycled lithium batteries after all the plastic and other metals are removed:

            You can watch the whole process from dead battery to extracted materials here, if you want.

            But that’s today’s tech. Sodium batteries are quickly taking over for grid scale storage. Sodium you might know as the 7th most abundant element on Earth, so we’re not running out of that any time soon.

          • Buffalox@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            10 months ago

            Oh boy, why are these sorts of comments always upvoted by people who obviously don’t know shit?
            First Lithium batteries are often reusable for secondary purposes when they don’t meet original specifications, and then they can be recycled pretty efficiently.

    • silence7@slrpnk.netOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 months ago

      At the cost it comes in at, it competes with longer-duration energy storage. Very expensive, and only has value to the extent that it reduces the need to build storage instead.

  • xam54321@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 months ago

    As far as I could tell, according to the article this delay is caused by the Covid pandemic.