Shamelessly copied from a post on a Lemmy look alike site :)
You must log in or register to comment.
This man is my hero.
personally Richard Stallman is my favorite out of the two but both are amazing people, who’s impact on the world of software can not be understated.
I agree with you 100%. Stallman is the soul of free software movement, he is the the philosopher of the movement and Torvalds the body, the “tech guy”
If you want to see what the world would look like without the GPL, just look at how the BSDs are getting shanked by Apple (and many other companies too, but they’re the biggest).
If it weren’t for him, I have no idea what Linux would be today. No doubt in my mind, RMS is #1 on my list of most important software developers to have ever lived.
This man is my our
he’s our our
He didn’t give up his fortune directly, because today he is a rich man. He just enriched with a different approach like opting to not lock the source code of his work like another guy we know well…
But I like him anyway
I don’t think he ever expected fortunes, going off his famous usenet post. He just wanted a Unix-like OS that wasn’t Minix and didn’t cost exactly one space shuttle. One that he could fuck around and do anything he wanted with without regard for someone else’s license and restrictions.
Everyone else wanting one too was a happy accident.
opting to not lock the source code of his work like another guy we know well…
I’m out of the loop, who are you referring to?
Mr.Redmond
Ahh, I thought it was somebody else you were talking about since DOS was never open source
It was about ms basic at the time I believe.
Interesting, so they had an open source product back then?
No, but they were very adamantly against the sharing of ms basic which was their big product (before dos), at a time when software sharing was fairly common.
He would’ve definitely made more even as a senior employee in early Microsoft, IBM or any of the big Corps. Linux exists solely because he made it a collaborative endeavour from the start.
Linux exists solely because he made it a collaborative endeavour from the start.
That is the important part. If Linux had tried to compete with Microsoft as a closed-source operating system, no one would have used it – who would use a tiny, buggy (back then), incomplete, closed-source operating system made by a few guys in their spare time against a very popular, feature-complete, close-source operating system with billions of dollars funding its engineering effort?
What makes Linux popular is that it is collectively owned, that is as much a feature of the operating system as any technology or algorithm written into the source code itself. That feature is what set it apart from Windows or Mac OS.
That so called “company mascot” on page 1 is so cute (-:
EDIT: the penguin, not Linus
Tux too
Linus too
Linus himself is not the mascot?
Linus is my superhero, apart from being the creator of Linux he can also give me marital recommendations
the Linux company mascot
They really had trouble wrapping their minds around this, didn’t they.
What?! You are doing something without a profit motive? That’s impossible. 🤯🤯🤯🤯
Not impossible, just The Most Generous Man In The World!
I’m Operations Manager at Linux.
A mind molded by a lifetime of neoliberal capitalism does this. Same as when they were all looking for the “Bitcoin CEO”.
Exactly, the neoliberal capitalist religion causes collective brain damage. Especially at that time, since there was a frenzy of propaganda around Bill Gates and how he became the worlds richest man by selling software, in particular operating systems. So from that non-logic it follows that if you have a popular operating system you should become the worlds richest man, but if you just give it all away for free, then you gave away a fortune. It makes total sense in the completely warped, schizophrenic world view of the US neoliberal mainstream media.
